Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

UNILATERAL VS. BILATERAL FIRST RAY SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 186 CONSECUTIVE CASES – COMPLICATIONS, PATIENT SATISFACTION, AND COST TO SOCIETY



Abstract

Many studies have evaluated bilateral versus unilateral surgery in large joints, however, limited research is available to compare outcomes of bilateral-staged foot surgeries versus synchronous-bilateral foot surgery. 186 consecutive cases of first metatarsophalangeal joint surgery were prospectively included in this study; 252 procedures were performed: 120 were unilateral or staged-bilateral, and 66 were synchronous-bilateral operations. Patients were evaluated at 6–and 12-weeks for specific early complications, and surveyed about there return to work, activities of daily living, shoe gear requirements, satisfaction, and reasons for choosing staged or synchronous surgery. Additionally, a cost analysis was performed on all surgical scenarios. Student-t test showed no statistical significance between groups in all clinical settings to a 95% confidence level. Complication rates were similar and few in all situations. Patients were very satisfied when choosing bilateral-synchronous surgery and would elect to repeat it the same way 97% of the time. The economic costs to the health system average 25% greater when patients undergoing first metatarsophalangeal joint surgery have the procedure performed one foot at a time. Combined with the time lost from work, this reveals a significant economic cost to both society and patient.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org