Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

MANAGEMENT OF MASSIVE CUFF TEAR ARTHROPATHY WITH REVERSE GEOMETRY SHOULDER PROSTHESIS – EXETER EXPERIENCE OF PAST SEVEN YEARS



Abstract

We present a retrospective analysis of 50 cases of cuff tear arthropathy, treated over past seven year period by use of reverse geometry shoulder prosthesis. 98% follow-up was achieved with average follow up of 3 years. Mean (SD) age was 81.3 (9.2) years and female to male ratio was 5:1. Six patients had bilateral reverse geometry shoulder replacements. Patients were assessed with preoperative Oxford and American Shoulder and Elbow Scores Society score (pre-op ASES) and post-operative American Shoulder and Elbow Society Score (post-op ASES), Oxford, Constant and SF36 scores. Mean pre-op ASES was 22.29 (95%CI: 9.1 – 37.9) and post-op ASES score was 65.2 (95%CI: 48.5 – 81.9), (P< 0.001, Paired t-test). Mean post operative Oxford score was 27.25 (95% CI: 18.4 – 27.6). Mean post operative Constant score was 63.2 (95% CI: 52.6 – 79.6). X-ray review was performed to assess scapular notching and Sirveaux score was used to grade extent of notching. 11 patients had Sirveaux grade 0, 5 had grade 1, 6 had grade 2, 12 had grade 3 and 8 had grade 4 notching. Intra-operative complications included 2 glenoid fractures. Post-operative complications included 2 acromion fractures and 2 episodes of subsidence with dislocation. None of the patients developed post operative haematoma. There was one episode of infection in one patient that required further surgery. Iteration of approach with increasing experience over the years will be discussed. Ours is the biggest series of reverse geometry prosthesis used for irreparable rotator cuff tear arthropathy published so far in the literature and our results have shown superior results in terms of improvement in function and complications. We conclude reverse geometry shoulder replacement provides reasonable improvement in pain and function in elderly population with massive cuff tear arthropathy of shoulder.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org