Abstract
Intramedullary nailing is acknowledged as a safe and effective mode of treatment for many tibial fractures. Implant removal is frequently indicated either as an elective procedure following union or because of problems such as infection or delayed fracture union. It is therefore essential that intramedullary rod removal should be reasonably straightforward and atraumatic.
We describe three cases in which bony growth into the implant has made rod removal either difficult or impossible. We include photographs of two removed implants with clearly visible areas of osseo-integration with bony growth into the cannulation through the interlocking holes as well as radiographs demonstrating the same phenomenon.
The average time between insertion and removal was 16 months. In all cases an end cap had been used such that insertion of the extraction device was straightforward but for two patients nail removal was extremely difficult due to bone ingrowth and in the third patient the nail had to be left in-situ. All three implants were made of titanium and the patients were all active young males. The authors have never encountered this problem with steel rods and speculate that the osteointegrative property of titanium is the major causative factor.
We suggest that unremoved intramedullary rods represent a major risk in fracture management and that close monitoring of these implants should be undertaken.
Correspondence should be addressed to Associate Professor N. Susan Stott, Orthopaedic Department, Starship Children’s Hospital, Private Bag 92024, Auckland, New Zealand.
