Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

EVALUATION OF KNEE JOINT PROPRIOCEPTION FOLLOWING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION – A 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP



Abstract

Deterioration in knee joint proprioception has been postulated to occur following injury, resulting in further instability due to disruption of receptors and feedback mechanisms. Surgical reconstruction techniques may also influence post-operative proprioceptive ability (PA). We hypothesised that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniques which disrupt the knee capsule would result in a decrease in PA.

Following ethical approval, a total of 48 subjects (mean age: 28.1 ± 10.5, 34 male, 14 female) undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery were included in the study. Fifteen subjects underwent “open” capsule ACL surgery and patellar tendon graft, whereas 33 subjects had “closed” capsule surgery with a hamstring tendon graft. Knee proprioception was measured on a custom-designed test apparatus incorporating electromagnetic position sensors (Polhemus Fastrack) located on femoral and tibial landmarks to accurately track knee angle during flexion-extension (no load). Leg flexion-extension under partial weight-bearing (5kg) was also evaluated. Pre-operative PA was assessed bilaterally, and then again on operated joints at three, six and twelve months post-op. Proprioceptive ability was measured as the cumulative absolute error in knee angle (°) between five repeat measurements and a target angle.

We observed no significant difference in PA between injured and contralateral knees prior to ACL reconstruction. Post-operatively, no significant difference in PA was observed between “open” versus “closed” ACL techniques, irrespective of loading conditions. While trends indicated that PA during knee extension (no load) and leg flexion (partial weight-bearing) improved over the 12 months compared to pre-operative values in closed ACL surgery, these were not significantly different to open ACL results.

The proportion of subjects whose PA improved in at least two out of the three post-op evaluations was also similar (approx 50%) across all groups, irrespective of joint loading. The only difference was PA during leg flexion under partial weight bearing, where 27% of open ACL surgery patients showed improvement in two or more follow-up tests, as opposed to 58% of closed ACL surgery patients.

We present a method to determine pre- and postoperative PA during knee flexion/extension under no load as well as under partial weight-bearing. We saw no significant difference in PA of the knee under no-load versus load. We also saw no significant difference in postoperative PA following open capsule, patellar tendon graft versus closed capsule, hamstring tendon graft ACL reconstruction technique after 1 year follow-up.

Correspondence should be addressed to Associate Professor N. Susan Stott, Orthopaedic Department, Starship Children’s Hospital, Private Bag 92024, Auckland, New Zealand.