HP22: THE VALUE OF PLAIN RADIOGRAPHS IN DETECTING THE PROGRESSION IN SIZE OF PERIACETABULAR OSTEOLYTIC LESIONS

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) provides a sensitive and accurate measure of periacetabular osteolytic lesion volume, however, there may remain a role for plain radiographs in monitoring osteolysis. This study aimed to compare CT and plain radiographs for determining the progression in size of osteolytic lesions around cementless acetabular components.

A high-resolution multi-slice CT scanner with metal artefact suppression was used to determine the volume and progression of osteolysis around 19 cementless Harris Galante-1 and PCA acetabular components. The mean duration since arthroplasty was 14 years (range 10–15 years) at initial CT. Repeat scans of the hip were undertaken over a five year period to determine the progression in size of osteolytic lesions over time. A second blinded observer manually measured the area of osteolytic lesions off anteroposterior pelvis radiographs and oblique radiographs of the acetabulum that were taken at the same time as the CT scan.

All 19 hips had CT detected osteolysis. Osteolysis was detected on one or both of the anteroposterior pelvis or oblique radiographs from at least one time point in eight of 19 hips (42%). Osteolysis was detected on 31 of 76 anteroposterior pelvis radiographs (41%) and on 22 of 75 oblique radiographs (29%) (p=0.140). Osteolysis was more likely to be detected on plain radiographs if the lesion volume was greater than 10cm3 in size compared to those 5–10cm3 and less than 5cm3 in size (p=0.009). In 10 of 19 hips (55%), CT determined that osteolytic lesions progressed in size by more than 1cm3/yr. The mean volume of osteolysis progression was 3.2cm3/yr (range 1.1–7.5cm3/yr). Progression in size of osteolytic lesions was significantly associated with hips with larger osteolytic lesions at the initial CT (p=0.0004). Radiographic measurements detected progression of osteolytic lesions in 5 of the 10 hips (50%) that progressed. No correlation was found between progression in size of osteolytic lesions as measured by CT and progression in size of osteolytic lesions as measured off the anteroposterior pelvis (r2 = 0.16, p=0.37), oblique (r2=0.37, p=0.15) and combined anteroposterior pelvis and oblique radiographs (r2=0.34, p=0.17).

Periacetabular osteolytic lesions are more likely to be detected on plain radiographs if they are more than 10cm3 in size. Plain radiographs may therefore provide some monitoring value as lesions more than 10cm3 are more likely to be progressive. However, plain radiographs should not be relied upon to monitor the progression of these lesions.