Abstract
The effect of cup geometry in uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty has not been investigated. We reviewed the radiological and clinical results of 527 primary total hip arthroplasties. We assessed the bone ingrowth potential of two geometric variations of an uncemented cup and compared hydroxyappetite and porous coated shells.
Patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty between 1997 and 2004 were prospectively entered into an arthroplasty database. Patients were reviewed at 1,2,4,5,8 and 10 years post surgery. Three acetabular shell types were used. These included hemispherical cups with porous or hydroxyapatite coating, and cups with peripheral expansion with porous coating. Radiographs with minimum 1-year follow-up were examined in 542 cases, using digital templating software. Radiographs were assessed for signs of bone in-growth, lucent lines, migration and polyethylene wear. Survivorship analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with 95% confidence intervals. Radiological findings and cup type were analysed using Fishers exact test.
Radiological evidence of bone ingrowth was seen in 82% of hemispherical cups, compared with 59% of peripherally expanded cups, which was significant (p,0.05). Bone ingrowth was not affected by the presence of HA coating. The most common diagnoses were osteoarthritis (67%) and avascular necrosis (12%). The mean age was 56 years. Survivorship with revision or impending revision for aseptic loosening was 95.6% at 7 years (95%CI 1.0134-0.8987). The 3 revisions and 1 impending revision for loosening were in patients with avascular necrosis (3) or previous acetabular and femoral osteotomies for DDH (1), with a mean age of 44 years.
Hemispherical shells have improved radiographic outcome in comparison with peripherally expanded components. At 7 years, clinical results are similar for both components.
The abstracts were prepared by David AF Morgan. Correspondence should be addressed to him at davidafmorgan@aoa.org.au
Declaration of interest: a
