Abstract
The stemmed tibial implant has enabled the salvage of challenging situations of bone loss in primary knee arthroplasty. This ease of use has unfortunately led to the adoption of stemmed implants in situations where this may not be warranted. In general uncontained defects of less than 5 mm may be dealt with using cement fill techniques. Defect of less than 10mm require bone grafting techniques and those above 10 mm require stems and wedges. In the third category however long term results suggest that good results are only attainable in 65% of cases whether grafts or wedges are used. The use of intramedullary guides in this setting is re-addressed to allow the accurate placement of cuts enabling the use of pegged (or non-stemmed) implants. In addition with the advent of navigation this may be a special situation where non-stemmed implants may be selected over stemmed implants.
Correspondence should be addressed to ISTA Secretariat, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Tel: 1-916-454-9884, Fax: 1-916-454-9882, Email: ista@pacbell.net
