SHORT TERM FOLLOW-UP RESULTS OF SEMICONSTRAINED AND UNCONSTRAINED TYPE OF TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY: AGILITY VS HITEGRA

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the two prosthesis which were used for total ankle arthroplasty. From Sept. 2003 to Jun 2007, 13 patients and 14 ankles that could be follow up more than 2 years. Semiconstrained type (Group I, 7cases) and Unconstrained type (Group II, 7cases) were used for total ankle arthroplasty. Mean age was 63.2 year-old, 12 ankles are men and 2 ankles were women. Mean follow up periods were 31.1 months. The criteria to compare the clinical result were postoperative range of motion (ROM), AOFAS foot score and residual bone stock of medial malleolus.

Postoperative ROM of group I was 37.5±7.1 degree and of group II was 51.4±8.9. Postoperative AOFAS score of group I was 76.1±13.8 and of group II was 86.0±5.7. Residual bone stock in medial malleolus of group I was 6.1mm±0.7 and of group II was 11.5mm±0.9. Total number of complication in our study was 9 cases. 3 cases were a malleolar fracture, two occurred at intra-operation, the other at follow-up period. Re-operation was done in 6 cases, 3 cases were calcaneal corrective osteotomy, 2 cases were resection of a heterotopic bone and one case was pedicular flap operation for skin problem.

In our hospital, mobile bearing type prosthesis showed good result than a semiconstrained type in respect of ROM improvement and of residual bone stock in medial malleolus. AOFAS score between two groups showed no definite difference. But small number of patients and short term follow up period is a defect in our study, afterward more population and long term follow up period are needed.