WEAR MAPPING ANALYSIS WITH RETRIEVAL 28MM COCR-COCR HIP BEARINGS – 11-YEARS EXPERIENCE

Abstract

While there are many variation laboratory and clinical studies using metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings after introduction of the 28mm MOM THR in 1988, the mapping of wear phenomena in such retrieval cases has been mimimal. In laboratory study, 28mm MOM bearing’s wear-rate was low with “run-in” and “steady-state” than large diameter MOM without theory of fluid-filum lubrication. In clinical results were not superior to the same way of laboratory study. We present a detailed analysis of 33 retrieved MOM hip bearings with 1–11 years follow-up,

We compiled 33 retrieval cases (MetasulTM: Zimmer/CenterPulse Inc., Austin, TX) including clinical information, ion concentrations from ball diameters, cup designs and stripe wear damage. The bearing surfaces were mapped using reflected light microscope (RLM), white light interferometer (Zygo Newview 600, Zygo.) and SEM(XL-30 FEG). Wear maps were constructed according to types of surface wear identified.

Patients ranged from 36 to 76 years of age (Means: 56.9 years); 54% were males. Main causes for revision were progressive radiographic lines around the cups, osteolysis and pain. The 28mm ball diameter was used in 86% of cases (largest = 52mm ball). The CoCr liner incorporated a polyethylene adaptor in 75% of cases. Cup diameter > 50mm was present in 75% of cases. Eight femoral stems were recovered and all showed major impingement marks around the neck and five also had a metallosis (Mode-4A). Stripe wear was evident on 71% of CoCr balls with medial stripes twice as common as lateral. Stripe wear was identified in 25% of CoCr liners and extended 25–160° circumference around the liners. Clear liner rim damage was present in 10 (30%) and 3 demostrated severe damage of polyethelene adaptors.

There are many limitations to such retrieval studies. These data are biased to cases that failed due to hip pain, radiographic signs of progressive osteolysis and some with high levels of metal ions. There was also the bias of having predominantly a CoCr sandwich design (polyethylene adaptor in 75% of cases). In early 1980s, the thin walled UHMWPE cup was introduced and used larger diameter balls for decreased risk of dislocation. However, unfortunally these big-ball cups produced significant PE wear debris, and diameter trends were returned to the Chanley’s small-ball paradigm again. In the same time (late of 1980’s), these second-generation MOM (28,32mm) was introduced for low wear characteristics alternate THR bearings, with sacrificing of joint stability and motion range. However, use of the small ball added well-known risks of impingement, subluxation and dislocation with rigid cups. In this study, using the ‘damage modes’ from McKellop, normal mode-1 wear occurred in only 14% of cases whereas modes 2–4 had an incidence approaching 30% each and signs of cup impingement were evident in 64% of cases. Thus summarizing MOM wear phenomena in “small” 28mm sandwich cup designs, there was retrieval evidence showing that damage modes 2–4 likely placed these patients at risk for adverse wear effects.