EFFECT OF STEM DESIGN AND METHODS OF FIXATION ON STEM TIP PAIN IN REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY – A BIOMECHANICAL STUDY

Abstract

The use of stem provides consistent component alignment with immediate stable fixation and protects grafted bone by reducing stress on metaphyseal area in revision total knee arthroplasty. One of major concern with use of stems involves stem tip pain in cementless diaphyseal engaging stem. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of stem design and method of fixation on stem tip pain in revision total knee arthroplasty by finite element analysis.

3D finite element model of normal tibia was reconstructed from CT scan images of 26 year old male and the CAD model of revision total knee arthroplasty was developed using commercial software(CATIA^®, Dassault system, USA, version 8.20). The tibia component models were assembled based on conventional surgical procedure. The design changes of stem such as the length, diameter and slot were performed and methods of fixation including press fit and coefficient of friction was considered. The contact pressure and von-Mises stress around the stem and the micromotion at the interface were evaluated for a 2000 N of external load by finite element analysis to investigate the effect of stem design and methods of fixation on stem tip pain. The longer length and larger diameter press fit stem significantly increase the contact pressure & stress at the end of stem. The distal slot reduces the contact pressure & stress at the end of stem. Less displacement between tibial component and bone was noted in the increased coefficient of friction.

It would be better to avoid using press fit stem with extended length and larger diameter in revision total knee arthroplasty. More flexibility of stem tip would be favorable because of less concentration of stress. Stem fixation with higher coefficient of friction would be recommended for less displacement of tibial component. Stem with shorter length enough to engage proximal diaphysis, closer diameter of proximal canal and minimal press fit could be accepted to reduce stem tip pain if patient’s surgical anatomy such as bone loss and quality is tolerable in revision total knee arthroplasty.