Abstract
Purpose: We have performed this study to compare the postoperative maximal flexion angle(MFA) of high-flex implants with that of conventional implants in PCL-substituted total knee arthroplasty(TKA).
Materials and Methods: The staged sequential bilateral TKAs were performed in Group 1, 35 patients(70 knees) with osteoarthritis of both knee. The conventional implant and the high-flex implant were both used in each patient by randomized method. The postoperative MFA of both type of implants was measured and analyzed at 1 year after surgery. To evaluate unidentified factors that might influence the results, such as the differences derived from personal characteristics during postoperative rehabilitation process achieving the range of motion of knee, we also analyzed the other patient groups, which were composed of Group 2(10 patients, 20 knees) bilaterally operated with conventional implants, Group 3(7 patients, 14 knees) bilaterally with high-flex implants, Group 4(13 patients, 13 knees) unilaterally with conventional implants and Group 5(17 patients, 17 knees) unilaterally with high-flex implant.
Results: In Group 1, the average postoperative MFA of high-flex implant and that of conventional implant showed no significant difference.(131.7 and 131.9 degree each) The average postoperative MFA in Group 1,2,3,4 and 5 showed no significant difference either.
Conclusion: This study indicates that the high-flex implant alone does not seem to improve the MFA as compared to the conventional implant. The status of the contralateral knee and the personal characteristics during rehabilitation seem to be more important factors in increasing the maximal flexion.
Correspondence should be addressed to ISTA Secretariat, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Tel: 1-916-454-9884, Fax: 1-916-454-9882, Email: ista@pacbell.net