FEMORAL FRACTURE RISK CAUSED BY PIN HOLE IN COMPUTER NAVIGATED TKA FOR HOLE SIZE AND POSITION: A PARAMETRIC STUDY BY FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Abstract

Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been increasingly used because it improves the accuracy of implant placement. However, some clinical cases have reported complications caused from pin holes during the computer navigated surgery. The objective of this study is to analyse the femoral fracture risk cause by the pin hole in the computer navigated TKA by using finite element analysis.

Three dimensional finite element model of the human femur was developed from CT images. A parametric investigation was conducted to analyse the femoral fracture risk for the following parameters: hole sizes (3, 4, and 5 mm) and hole position (70, 100, and 130 mm above the distal end). Four different penetrations (unicortical, bicortical, half-bicortical, and transcortical) methods in tubular bone were considered in each model, where the half-bicortical penetration was defined that the pin hole was located between the holes of bicortical and transcortical penetrations. The finite element model was rigidly fixed to a distance of 25 mm above the distal end. The vertical load of 1500 N and the torsional load of 12 Nm were applied to the femoral head. The maximum von-Mises stress, which was chosen as the fracture risk factor, was then investigated around pin hole.

The maximum von-Mises stress around the pin hole was the highest in the transcortical penetration for different hole sizes: 7.8~8.5, 15.7~16.2, 15.5~16.8, and 25.5~45.3 MPa under the vertical load, and 9.6~10.5, 9.7~11.0, 8.8~10.2, and 14.2~33.8 MPa under the torsional load in unicortical, bicortical, half-bicortical, and transcortical penetrations, respectively. For the different hole position, the maximum von-Mises stress around the pin hole was: 6.0~7.8, 15.7~24.7, 16.3~19.6, and 12.2~22.4 MPa under the vertical load, and 9.6~10.7, 9.7~11.5, 8.7~9.8, and 12.2~16.6 MPa under the torsional load in unicortical, bicortical, half-bicortical, and transcortical penetrations, respectively.

For the pin hole size, the maximum stress increased only in the transcortical penetration regardless of the loads as the pin hole size increased. However, there was little meaningful difference between the hole positions for each penetration method. The results of this study suggested that it would be beneficial to avoid using the transcortical penetration and large size of pin with respect to reduction of femoral fracture risk since the high stress may cause the femoral fracture.