A NOVEL METHOD TO SOLVE DISPARITIES BETWEEN RADIOGRAPHIC AND NAVIGATIONAL MEASUREMENTS OF LIMB ALIGNMENTS IN COMPUTER ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Abstract

Application of computer assisted navigation (CAN) has been documented to improve the accuracy of limb alignment and implant positioning. However, a recent study reported that a great deal of disparities occurred between the radiographic and navigational measurements calling the basic argument for application of CAN to TKA into question. In the authors’ practice using CAN for TKA, we have observed consistent disparities between the preoperative radiographic assessments and intraoperative navigational assessments of limb alignment in the coronal plane. A large disparity between radiographic and navigational assessments of limb alignment would be presenting a challenging question whether or not the surgeon can rely on the information provided by the CAN system. We developed a novel method to measure the coronal limb alignment and have found that the radiographic measurements with the novel method remarkably reduce the disparities between the radiographic and navigational assessments of the coronal limb alignment. This study was conducted to document the existence of the disparities between the radiographic and navigational assessments of the limb alignment and the value of our novel method to perform preoperative radiographic measurements of limb alignment.

In 107 TKAs performed using a CAN system (Ortho-pilot: B. Braun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany), radiographic assessments of coronal limb alignment were assessed using preoperative and postoperative whole limb radiographs taken with weight bearing with two different methods: a standard method, angle between the femoral mechanical axis (the line connecting hip center and the top pint of the femoral intercondylar notch) and a tibial mechanical axis (the line connecting the mid-point between the medial and lateral tibial eminences and the mid-point of the talus dome) and a novel method, the angle between the weight loading line (the line connecting the hip center and the mid-point of the talus dome) and the tibial mechanical axis. A negative value was given to a varus alignment and a positive value to the valgus alignment. During surgery, the coronal limb alignment was measured by the navigation system two different time-points: after registration and after implantation of prostheses. The disparity between the radiographic and navigational assessments was calculated with subtracting the radiographic assessments by the navigational assessments.

The disparity between the radiographic and navigational assessments was significantly smaller with the novel method than with the standard method. The mean difference between the radiographic and navigational assessments of preoperative limb alignment was −6.5o (range: −19 ~ 1) with the standard method and −0.9o (range: −8o to 4o) with the novel method. The mean difference between the radiographic and navigational assessments of the postoperative limb alignment was −1.96 (range: −11 ~ 3) with the standard method and −1.3 (range: −6 ~3).

This study documents that a wide range of disparities occurs between the radiographic and navigational assessments of limb alignment and the amount of disparity occurs in preoperative assessments. Our findings indicate that our novel method to perform the radiographic assessments of limb alignment can be a useful tool to interpret the information intraoperatively given by the navigation system.