Abstract
The anterior pelvic plane (APP) through the bilateral anterior superior iliac spines (ASIS) and pubic tuberosities is often used as a pelvic reference in measuring orientation of the acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty. Apophyses such as ASIS are, however, anatomically variable among patients and APP does not always represent the functional pelvic tilt in the sagittal plane in each patient. Therefore, malposition of the cup and recurrent dislocation may occur even though the cup is placed in a safe zone when measured against APP. We analyzed dynamic pelvic tilt angle in the sagittal plane using a motion analysis system after THA and we found a case of recurrent dislocation due to an unusual APP tilt.
A 77-year-old woman underwent primary THA 3 years ago and cup re-implantation was done with the use of a 10-degree elevated liner and the head diameter was increased from 26mm to 28 mm after two anterior dislocations. However, posterior dislocation occurred 11 times after this. A second revision was performed with a 36 mm head and cup anteversion was optimized against APP. Further posterior dislocations occurred twice again. To probe the cause of recurrent dislocation, we performed motion analysis using a 6-camera VICON system and the markers were registered to the bone and implant models based on the postoperative CT images. This system visually represents four-dimensional dynamic motions that include the time sequential transitions of components and their posture. The cup had been placed in 6 degrees of radiographic anteversion against APP, and in −13 degrees of radiographic retroversion in supine (FPP), because the pelvic flexion angle in supine was 17.6 degrees. Furthermore, when standing, the pelvic flexion angle increased 10 degrees.
Malposition of the acetabular cup in THA is the most common cause of dislocation. To avoid errors in cup placement, computer navigation systems have been introduced and most of the navigation systems refer APP to establish cup orientation. There are two drawbacks in using APP as the reference. One is that apophyses such as ASIS develop variably in each patient with a resulting variability in APP tilt in the sagittal plane in supine. The other is significant changes in pelvis tilt during various activities of daily living such as standing, walking, and sitting. Therefore, even if cup orientation is acceptable when referencing APP, it can be mal-oriented in a functional position of the pelvis as in this case, which showed proper anteversion against APP but retroversion in supine, standing and sitting.
In conclusion, we found that there exists a case in which APP is not a suitable pelvic reference in determining orientation of the cup.
Correspondence should be addressed to ISTA Secretariat, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. Tel: 1-916-454-9884, Fax: 1-916-454-9882, Email: ista@pacbell.net
