A SLOT TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE FEMORAL CEMENTATION DURING HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY

Abstract

Variability in femoral head preparation and high cement pressures may be associated with failure to seat femoral components during hip resurfacing. Furthermore, excessive pressures may lead to over penetration of bone by cement with resulting necrosis of the underlying bone. We designed an experimental model to test the hypothesis that partial-length pressure-relief slots made longitudinally in the proximal bone of the femoral head, without extending to the head neck junction, would allow controlled leakage of cement during initial insertion of a femoral head resurfacing component, but would then become sealed during final insertion to prevent excessive loss of cement while still allowing accurate seating of the component.

Thirty-one resurfacing femoral components were cemented onto foam femoral head models. The clearance between foam model and implant was measured to determine the minimum space available for cement. Eleven components were inserted using hand pressure alone, 20 were hammered. Pressure relief slots were prepared in 10 femoral heads. The slots, 4mm deep grooves, were made in the proximal bone only, without extending to the head-neck junction. Cement pressure inside the component was measured during insertion. Implants were sectioned after implantation in order to determine whether they had been fully seated or not. The clinical relevance of the measures taken was tested by measuring the diameter of prepared femoral heads during 20 hip resurfacing operations in order to determine the extent of variability in intra-operative femoral head preparation.

Mean intraoperative clearance between bone and implant was −0.19mm (0.11 to −0.93mm). Mean clearance between foam model and implant was −0.30mm (0.35 to −0.94mm). Full seating was obtained in 22/31 components. Of those not fully seated, all had clearance less than −0.74mm. Full seating with a clearance of less than −0.35mm was only possible when pressure relief slots had been made in the femur. The use of a pressure relief slot longer than half the femoral head length allowed full seating in 9/9 cases, compared to 13/22 without. Cement pressure obtained with a hand pressure technique was less than half that observed with hammering (20.8vs56.0psi, p=0.0009) but was not associated with failure to seat the implant if a slot was used.

Variability of the actual diameter of the femoral head prepared may be associated with difficulty in fully seating resurfacing components. The same degree of variability in the space available for cement was observed in both intra-operative and test specimens. The use of a pressure-relief slot allows full seating of resurfacing implants with hand pressure alone, thereby halving cement pressure, in an experimental model, even when clearance between implant and bone is less than optimal.