INVESTIGATION OF BUFFERED IMPLANT FIXATION IN RAT MODEL: MEASUREMENT OF INTERFACE STRENGTH IN COMPARISON WITH CEMENTED IMPALANT FIXATION

Abstract

We suggested a new concept of buffered implant fixation. It is a cementless fixation using a buffer instead of the cement between the bone and the implant. We investigated the feasibility of the buffered implant fixation using a rat model. In our previous study, we measured the amount of bone around the implant to compare the buffered implant fixation with the cemented fixation. The results showed the difference in change of Bone Volume/Total Volume (BV/TV) with time between the buffered fixation and the cemented fixation. Now, in this study, we are comparing the mechanical interface strength between two fixations.

After micro CT scanning, the specimens were used for mechanical push-out test to measure the interface shear strength at the buffer-bone or cement-bone interface. The distal side of the femur was carefully removed to expose the whole distal region of the implant while the proximal side of femur was cut carefully with diamond saw (Metsaw, R& B Inc., Korea) until the proximal end of cement or buffer is exposed. The femur was embedded into a push-out jig with a plaster. The push-out jig was mounted in a material testing machine (KSU-10M, Kyungsung testing machine, Korea) and loaded at a rate of 0.01mm/s. The apparent interface strength was calculated by dividing the peak force by the surface area of the buffer or cement.

After 2 weeks, the apparent interface strength is 217.0 ± 280.0(average ± standard deviation) for buffer and 472.4 ± 381.1 for cement; after 4 weeks, 92.9 ± 67.6 and 268.1 ± 197.9; after 12 weeks, 441.9 ± 467.1 and 201.8 ± 132.3, respectively. The buffered fixation showed gain in strength with time while the cemented fixation showed reverse tendency but the interaction by ANOVA was not significant (p=0.125). Even though the excellence of buffer fixation was not clearly confirmed because of small sample size and high variance, the feasibility of the buffer fixation was shown.

However, further studies are necessary to improve the buffered implant fixation. To enhance the cell adhesion and biocompatibility, it is necessary to modify the surface of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) such as by plasma treatment or biological coating. Also, an animal test using a higher level animal such as dog or pig is necessary.