SUSPECTED ACUTE FRACTURE OF THE SCAPHOID – CAST OR SPLINT IMMOBILIZATION? THE ECONOMIC IMPLICATION.

Abstract

In a prospective randomized trial, we divided a group of patients with a clinically suspicious, although radiographically normal, acute fracture of the scaphoid into 2 groups, 1 treated with a cast (group I), the other with a splint (group II). There were 14 patients in group I, and 18 in group II. Patients were reviewed at 2,6, and 12 weeks for range of movement, grip strength, pain and satisfaction rating. Work disability costs were also calculated for both groups. Patients in group II had better range of movement and grip strength at 2 weeks, although complained of more pain. There was no difference in range of movement, grip strength, or pain at 6 or 12 weeks. Group II was more satisfied at 2 weeks, although not at 6 or 12 weeks. Group I required more time off work, and disability costs were significantly higher [€15,209 per person compared to €3,317 per person]. We recommend that all patients, with only a clinical suspicion of a fractured scaphoid, should have a short period of splint immobilization until symptoms resolve, or until further investigations reveal a fracture which can be appropriately treated. This policy is cost efficient and improves the short term outcome.