Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PAPER 161: PERIPROSTHETIC HUMERAL FRACTURES DURING SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY



Abstract

Purpose: Currently, there is little information available on the management and outcome of intra-operative periprosthetic humeral fractures during shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to report on the incidence, management, and outcome of intra-operative periprosthetic humeral fractures.

Method: Between 1980 and 2002, forty-six intra-operative periprosthetic humeral fractures occurred during shoulder arthroplasty at our institution. Thirty-six fractures occurred during primary total shoulder arthroplasty, five during primary hemiarthroplasty and four during revision shoulder arthroplasty. Twenty-one fractures involved the greater tuberosity, 16 the humeral shaft, 6 were metaphyseal and 2 fractures involved the greater tuberosity and extended to the humeral shaft. All patients were followed for a minimum of two years (mean, 7.5 years). At final follow-up, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and ASES scores were calculated and preoperative, postoperative, and most recent radiographs were examined for fracture healing and implant integrity.

Results: The incidence of intra-operative humerus fractures at our institution was 1.5%. All fractures healed at mean of 13 weeks (range, 6 to 56 weeks). At a mean final follow-up of 90 months (range, 25 to 194 months), the mean forward elevation was 108° and the mean external rotation was 39°. The mean SST was 6 and the mean ASES score was 61. Four patients underwent revision shoulder surgery, two for shoulder instability, one for a massive rotator cuff tear, and one for another periprosthetic humerus fracture that occurred after a fall. Complications included transient nerve injuries in six patients and four fractures displaced postoperatively which were then managed nonoperatively to healing.

Conclusion: The data from this study suggest that although intra-operative fractures have a high rate of healing, there was a significant rate of associated complications including transient nerve injuries and fracture displacement. Patients with intra-operative fractures also appear to have less forward elevation at final follow-up when compared to patients who have not sustained an intra-operative humeral fracture.

Correspondence should be addressed to Meghan Corbeil, Meetings Coordinator Email: meghan@canorth.org