PAPER 158: REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY: INDICATIONS AND RESULTS OF THE FRENCH MULTICENTER STUDY

Abstract

Purpose: The reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly common and the indications expanded. The objective of this study is to report the indications and results of RSA in a large multicenter study.

Method: A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted including all RSA implanted between 1992 and 2002 in five centers in France. Of 457 patients involved in this study, 243 patients (53%) had cuff pathology: 149 had cuff tear arthropathy, 48 had massive cuff tears, and 45 had failed cuff surgery. Ninety-nine (22%) had revision of a previous arthroplasty. Sixty (13%) had fracture-related problems. Twenty-six (6%) had osteoarthritis and two percent each had rheumatoid arthritis, tumors or other conditions. Three hundred and eighty-nine (85%) shoulders were available for review at a mean follow-up of 44 months (range, 24–142). The average age at review was 76 years (range, 22–92).

Results: Overall, significant improvement was noted in Constant scores for pain (3.5 to 12.1), activity (5.8 to 15.1), mobility (12.1 to 24.5) and strength (1.3 to 6.1) (p< 0.0001). Active elevation improved (p< 0.0001), but active internal and external rotation did not. The results were dependent on the indication. Cuff tear arthropathy had the best results while revision procedures had the worst. Young age, preoperative stiffness, teres minor deficiency, tuberosity non-union and preoperative complaints of pain rather than loss of function tended to be associated with inferior results. The deltopectoral approach tended toward greater active elevation but greater risk of instability. Survivorship to the endpoints of revision and loosening was better for patients with cuff tear pathology than for patients with failed prior hemiarthroplasty. The functional results were noted to deteriorate progressively after six years in the cuff tear pathology group, after five years in the revision hemiarthroplasty group, after three years in the osteoarthritis group, and after one year in the revision total shoulder arthroplasty group.

Conclusion: Overall results of RSA are satisfactory and predictable. Functional results improved with improved active elevation, but no improvement in active internal and external rotation. However, results are dependent on etiology.