Abstract
Purpose: We report the clinical and functional outcome of limb salvage surgery and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the distal tibia and ankle joint in 5 patients.
Introduction: The distal tibia is an uncommon site for primary malignant bone tumours and the treatment of choice for most patients is a below knee amputation. Patients who decline an amputation may be offered an endoprosthetic replacement. This is a technically challenging operation and may be associated with high morbidity.
Methods and Results: Over 25 years at our centre, 5 patients underwent distal tibial replacements for bone or soft tissue sarcomas. Two had osteosarcoma, one had a recurrence of Ewing’s sarcoma, one had malignant fibrous histiocytoma, and one had an adamantinoma. The mean age was 37 years (13 to 69 years). There were no tumour recurrences. Four patients developed complications with wound infection. Two of these resulted in below knee amputations. Average follow-up was 31 months (19 to 55 months) with 1 patient lost to follow-up. Patients were evaluated using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) score. The mean MSTS score was 88% and the mean TESS was 88.5%. Two patients who later had a below knee amputation and who were using a prosthesis averaged an MSTS score of 86.3% and a TESS of 89.3%.
Conclusion: For those patients who are unwilling to undergo an amputation for malignant tumours of the distal tibia, endoprosthetic reconstruction is an alternative, but at the cost of increased risk of significant complications, functional deterioration and morbidity. There was little difference between functional scores for patients who proceeded to have a below knee amputation compared to patients who still had their endoprosthesis
The abstracts were prepared by Mrs Leslie O’Leary. Correspondence should be addressed to her at British Orthopaedic Association, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE or at l.oleary@boa.ac.uk
