Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ROUTINE MRI SURVEILLANCE FOLLOWING DEFINITIVE TREATMENT OF BONE AND SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA



Abstract

Introduction: Local recurrence of tumour following definitive treatment of bone or soft tissue sarcoma is a predictor of increased morbidity. Early detection of local recurrence may affect outcome. The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening following definitive treatment is controversial. This study investigates the experience of one treatment centre with routine surveillance MRI following treatment of sarcoma.

Methods: Patients were identified from the records of the Regional Sarcoma Group. With Local Ethics Committee approval the casenotes, MRI and histology reports for sixty-five patients who had routine surveillance MRI scans following definitive treatment of sarcoma in a single treatment centre were reviewed. The minimum follow up period was 24 months. The primary outcome was the presence of local tumour recurrence and whether this was identified on surveillance or interval scanning.

Results: There were sixty-four patients identified with a bone or soft tissue sarcoma. All had undergone surveillance scanning biannually for the first year then annually. Six patients with Ewing’s sarcoma were excluded because they had not had surgical excision. Fifty-eight patients (59% men) with a bone or soft tissue sarcoma without metastasis between 1996 and 2003 were available for study. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range 6–78 years). Eighty three percent had a diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma. Ten patients had a primary bone tumour. Fourteen patients had local recurrence (24%). Six were identified on surveillance scan, and the remaining eight required interval scans because of clinical suspicion of tumour recurrence. There were no statistical differences in gender, age, or tumour characteristics between those identified on surveillance or interval scans. All those detected on surveillance had intra-lesional or marginal resections.

Conclusions: Surveillance scanning has a role in the early detection of local recurrence of bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Whether this results improvements in prognosis require longer-term follow up studies.

The abstracts were prepared by Mrs Leslie O’Leary. Correspondence should be addressed to her at British Orthopaedic Association, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE or at l.oleary@boa.ac.uk