Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

P19 A 3-DIMENSIONAL, IN VITRO MODEL TO STUDY THE EFFECTS OF COMPRESSIVE LOADING ON OSTEOBLASTIC CELLS



Abstract

Mechanical force is an osteoinductive factor that plays an important role in bone growth and repair in vivo (Carter et al. 1988). Many in vitro studies have shown that osteoblasts and osteocytes respond to mechanical loads such as stretch and fluid-flow induced shear stresses, with initiation of signalling pathways (Reilly et al 2003). The underlying mechanisms by which bone cells respond to mechanical signals are difficult to investigate in a 3-D environment, because of reduced nutrient delivery to cells and difficulties in analysis.

We are developing a model to analyse the effects of mechanical compression on matrix forming osteoblasts in a 3-D system. Our model uses polyurethane (PU) open cell foam scaffolds, MLO-A5 osteoblast-like cells (Kato et al 2001) and a sterile fluid filled biodynamic loading chamber (Bose). We have shown using a cell proliferation assay (Promega) that cells survive well and proliferate in the PU scaffolds. Cell number after 15 days of culture was four times that after 5 days of culture. To examine the effect of mechanical stimulation on osteoblastic cells we seeded MLO-A5, kindly donated by Dr. L. Bonewald, at densities of 125,000 cells per scaffold in PU foam cylinders, 10 mm thick and 25 mm diameter. The cell seeded PU scaffolds were dynamically loaded in compression at 1Hz, 5% strain in a sterile fluid-filled chamber. Loading was applied for 2 hours per day at days 5, 7 and 9 of culture. In between loading cycles, scaffolds were cultured in an incubator in standard conditions.

Preliminary data indicates that the cells survived loading but final cell number was reduced compared to unloaded controls by 30%. However, the scaffold stiffness (Young’s modulus) increased in loaded samples over time (days) which may be an indication of increased matrix production. Fluorescence microscopy indicated that loaded cells were distributed in dense clusters whereas unloaded cells were distributed evenly throughout the scaffold. In conclusion, this model has the potential to answer questions about cell survival, distribution and matrix production in 3-D, in response to mechanical signals.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos Wigderowitz, Senior Lecturer, University Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.