Abstract
Background: The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) use in the lateral compartment has been associated with a reduced flexion range and diminished femoral rollback. It is postulated that this may be due to a flat tibial tray replacing the domed anatomy of the lateral tibia, tightening the posterolateral flex-ion gap. A new design incorporating a domed tibial component and a biconcave meniscal bearing has been developed to increase; (i) the posterolateral flexion gap in deep knee flexion (ii) meniscal bearing movement and (iii) lateral femoral condyle (LFC) rollback. A cadaveric study was designed to test these three outcomes.
Methods: The sagittal plane kinematics of seven thawed fresh frozen cadaver specimens within an upright Oxford testing rig were assessed under three different conditions; (i) intact normal cadaver knee (ii) flat lateral Oxford UKR (iii) domed lateral Oxford UKR. Each condition was tested during three ranges of motion (ROM) and data recorded during a flexion or extension half cycle. Knee flexion angle (KFA) and displacement measures of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), LFC rollback and anteroposterior meniscal bearing movement were performed throughout knee ROM using four [3 linear, 1 rotary] potentiometer devices. Potentiometer data was recorded as a voltage reading and subsequently converted to either a millimetre displacement or degree measure using a calibration formula. All data points were compared at 10 degree interpolations of KFA.
Results: The flexion half cycles demonstrated the flat Oxford lateral UKR achieved 80.7% of normal cadaveric LFC rollback. The domed Oxford lateral UKR achieved 108.8% of normal cadaveric LFC rollback. The ratio of LFC rollback in the domed to flat UKR’s was 1.35 times (134.9%). Meniscal bearing movement in flexion demonstrated a domed to flat UKR ratio of 1.3 times (129.7%). Similar values were obtained for extension half cycles in favour of the domed Oxford lateral UKR. No significant differences were identified in LCL measures.
Conclusions: The domed Oxford lateral UKR implant allows for improved bearing movement and femoral rollback when compared to the flat Oxford lateral UKR. The sagittal plane kinematics of the domed Oxford lateral UKR as represented by femoral rollback values approximate those of the normal cadaver knee.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos Wigderowitz, Senior Lecturer, University Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.
