Abstract
Introduction: There is a recent trend of using a raft of small diameter 3.5 mm cortical screws instead of the large diameter 6.5mm screws in depressed tibial plateau fractures. Our aim was to compare the biomechanical properties of these two constructs in the normal and osteoporotic synthetic bone model.
Methods: 20 rigid polyurethane foam blocks with a density simulating osteoporotic bone and normal bone were obtained. A Schatzker type 3 fracture was created in each block. The fracture fragments were then elevated and supported using 2, 6.5mm cancellous screws or 4, 3.5mm cortical screws.
The fractures were loaded using a Lloyd’s machine and a load displacement curve was plotted.
Results: Osteoporotic model. The mean force needed to produce a depression of 5mm was 700.8N with the 4-screw construct and 512.4N with the 2 screw construct (p=0.007).
Non-osteoporotic model. The mean force requires to produce the same depression was 1878.2N with the 2-screw construct and 1938.2N with the 4 screw construct (p=0.42).
An increased fragmentation of the synthetic bone fragments was noticed with the 2-screw construct but not with the 4-screw construct.
Conclusion: A raft of 4, 3.5 mm cortical screws is biomechanically stronger than two, 6.5mm cancellous screws in resisting axial compression in osteoporotic bone.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Tim Wilton, BASK at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.
