IS SERUM ANALYSIS EQUIVALENT TO WHOLE BLOOD IN THE ASSESSMENT OF SYSTEMIC METAL EXPOSURE IN ARTHROPLASTY?

Abstract

Introduction: Metal ions generated from metal-metal joints are transported in plasma and within cells. Whole blood (WB) analysis is a good measure of systemic metal exposure because it includes both intracellular and extracellular compartments. Analysis of whole blood is technically more challenging than serum. But can serum levels be considered equivalent to whole blood levels in the assessment of systemic metal exposure?

Methods: 262 concurrent WB and serum specimens from patients after metal-metal hip arthroplasty were analyzed for metal levels by high-resolution mass-spectrometry (reporting limits 0.06μg/l for serum and 0.1μg/l for WB). The relationship between serum and WB levels were studied using four methods of agreement testing: paired t-test, Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman agreement and variability on normalized-scatter.

Results: Mean WB and serum chromium concentrations were 2.2 and 4.2μg/l (p< 0.001). Corresponding values for cobalt were 2.4 and 3.2 μg/l (p< 0.001). The normalized scatter (fig 1B) shows poor congruence between whole blood and serum levels especially at lower concentrations. Pearson correlation confirms poor agreement at lower concentrations even after excluding outliers.

Bland-Altman analysis (Figure 1A) shows the limits of agreement between serum and WB are unacceptably wide (1.7 to -5.1 for chromium) suggesting poor agreement.

Discussion: The proportion of metal ion levels in serum and blood cells shows great variability. With advances made inmass-spectrometry, poor instrument sensitivity is a non-issue. Is there then a case for continued use of serum as a measure of systemic metal ion exposure? It can be justified only if serum levels show good agreement with WB levels throughout the range of measurements. Concurrent analysis of serum and whole blood metal ion concentrations in the present study, do not show such an agreement with four methods of testing, suggesting that serum metal concentrations cannot be reliably used as an instrument to measure systemic metal ion exposure.