EXTERNAL ROTATION OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT FACILITATES FLEXION OF TOTAL KNEE PROSTHESES BETWEEN 90 AND 130 DEGREES FLEXION

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The aim of this study was to analyze rotation of the normal and prosthetic distal femur as well as the spaces from 90 to 130 degrees flexion.

Material and methods: Torsion scans were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively for 44 total knee prostheses. The difference in femoral torsion between the pre- and postoperative image was used to assess the rotation in which the femoral component was implanted. The prostheses were divided into two groups: group I when the femoral implant was implanted with external rotation of more than 5°; group II when the femoral implant was implanted with external rotation less than 5°. A preoperative stress scan was obtained in 20 patients then repeated during the year following implantation. Stress images with knee flexion at angles from 90° to 130° were obtained. The patient was installed in the ventral supine position. 8mm scan slices were centered on the lower end of the femur, ten 50ms images were acquired during flexion movement from 90° to 130°. This enabled determination of the knee flexion axis preoperatively and postoperatively, to measure the variation in the epicondylar axis compared with the mechanical axis of the tibia between 90° and 130° flexion and finally to deduct change in the femorotibial space in flexion from 90° to 130°.

Results: The 18 total knee prostheses with a femoral component implanted with external rotation greater than 5° (group I) showed significantly greater range of flexion (p< 0.05) (mean 120°, range 110°–130°) than the 26 prostheses in group II with a femoral component implanted in external rotation less than 5° (mean 100°, range 80°–115°. For the 20 knees with stress scans, the preoperative images showed an epicondylar axis about 5° fro the mechanical axis of the tibia when the knee flexed in the 90°–130° range. After surgery, the stress scans showed that this epicondylar axis of rotation of the prosthesis-bearing knees occurred especially for knees with a wide range of flexion. The 20 knees with flexion limited to 100° did not present an epicondylar rotation axis compared with the mechanical axis of the tibia. The 15 knees with 125° flexion or more had an epicondylar axis of rotation after 90° flexion. Rotation of the epicondylar axis in relation to the mechanical axis of the tibia between 90° and 130° flexion was the consequence of a femorotibial space which changed in the medial and laeral femorotibial compartments between 90° and 130° flexion: after 90° flexion, the medial femorotibial space decreased and the lateral femorotibial space increased. This explains why movement from 90° flexion to 130° flexion was facilitated by placing the femoral piece in external rotation.

Discussion: Search for ligament balance for knee flexion above 90° is logical only if the goal is to obtain knee stability in extension and flexion at 90°. It is probably no rational if the goal is to allow the knee to reach flexion in the 120°–130° range. Ligament balance in flexion above 90° is important and should be maintained up through 130° flexion. The other solution is to empirically increase external rotation of the femoral component a few degrees in order to allow greater range of flexion.