CONSTRAINED KNEE PROSTHESES WITH A CEMENTED PRESS-FIT STEM: LONGEVITY OF THE FIXATION

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Revision total knee arthroplasty with major destruction of bone and ligament tissue raises the problem of choosing between a complex reconstruction with a semi-constrained prosthesis or a much more simple procedure using a hinged prosthesis which transmits all of the stress to the bone anchors. The choice is basically one of longevity of the bony fixation of these constrained prostheses (and the deterioration of the articulated pieces). The present work reports the long-term outcome observed with constrained hinged prosthesis with a cemented press-fit stem implanted for bone tumors where the stress is even greater than for revisions.

Material and methods: The series included 32 prostheses implanted in young active subjects (mean age 33 years). A hinged, non-rotating Guepar II revision prosthesis was implanted. The part of the implant corresponding to the reconstruction after tumor resection was custom-made but the part implanted in «healthy» bone (for example the tibial piece in a patient with a femoral tumor) was the same as used for revisions prostheses inserted after loosening. On the healthy side, press-fit quadrangular stems were used, generally adapted to the endosteum by reaming. The prosthesis was fixed by simple mechanical adjustment before cementing, using the French paradox system (JBJS 2003). Before 1993, a metal-polyethylene bearing was used and after 1993 a metal-on-metal bearing without inserts.

Results: Among the 32 patients with a malignant tumor, 19 survived, seven with 2–10 years follow-up and 12 with 10–21 years follow-up. For the overall series, there was only one case of osteolysis on a tibial tumor which was revised at 12 years. There was one infection (hematogeneous) at 21 years (antibiotic cement). Prostheses with polyethylene inserts produced laxities or synovitis with 50% requiring synovectomy and insert replacement. There were no cases of synovitis for the metal-on-metal bearings. Two stems (inserted in adolescents) were too thin and had to be changed because of fracture without loosening.

Discussion: Prosthesis survival was 88% at ten years (1 osteolysis, 2 fractures on tumor), even for the constrained prostheses, even for young and active subjects.

Conclusion: The very good longevity of cemented pressfit stems (and the absence of synovitis and osteolysis with metal-on-metal bearings, and the low rate of infection) should be kept in mind as a possible alternative to very complex and possibly less predictable procedures in the presence of certain very severe loosenings with bone and ligament destruction.