Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TITANIUM CAGES AND ALLOGRAFTS FOR ANTERIOR THORACOLUMBAR SPINE RECONSTRUCTION: CT ANALYSIS


Abstract

Purpose of the study: Titanium cases are used to achieve mechanical stable spinal reconstruction immediately after corpectomy. Bone grafts is often associated to ensure long-term success. Plain x-rays do not allow correct visualization of the graft within the cage, hindering evaluation of the fusion. The objectives of this study were to obtain a precise evaluation of the graft outcome within the cage using computed tomography (CT) and to search for factors affecting bone fusion.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients undergoing anterior reconstruction of the thoracolumbar spine with a titanium cage and a bone autograft. 3D CT reconstructions were obtained at least three months after reconstruction surgery. Three independent observers (two surgeons and a radiologist) analyzed the images. Standard CT criteria for graft fusion are not described in the literature for this type of arthrodesis so the criteria used were based on a descriptive analysis of the CT slices. A statistical analysis was then conducted to search for factors affecting fusion: epidemiological features, etiology, type of graft, size of the case, number of levels reconstructed, associated posterior arthrodesis. The regional angle was analyzed postoperatively and at last follow-up to determine how the sagittal correction was maintained.

Results: Twenty-eight cases were reviewed. Reconstructions had been performed for burst fractures, tumor resection, or deformed callus. CT analysis demonstrated three fusion zones to be examined: the upper, middle and lower part of the cases. Bony bridges were noted at the extremities in all cases. The middle part of the cage generally presented a heterogeneous image which was insufficient to confirm fusion. Loss of correction was not significant. No co-factors could be identified which influenced fusion.

Discussion and conclusion: Most of the cases reviewed did not present a continuous bony bridge from one end to the other of the cage yet the sagittal correction was satisfactory and persistent. The structure of the cages might be modified with a solid intermediary zone which could «spare» graft material.

Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.