Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate whether a biologically-active cement “Cortoss” confers any short-term mechanical advantages when compared with a polymethylmethacrylate bone cement “Spineplex” which is currently in widespread use.
Methods: Two thoracolumbar motion segments were harvested from each of six spines (51 – 82 yrs). Specimens were compressed to failure in moderate flexion to induce vertebral fracture. Pairs of specimens were randomly assigned to undergo vertebroplasty with either Cortoss or Spineplex. Compressive stiffness and compressive stress on the disc were measured before and after fracture, and after vertebroplasty. Compressive stress was measured by pulling a pressure- sensitive needle through the mid-sagittal diameter of the disc whilst under 1.5kN load. Intradiscal pressure (IDP), peak stress in the annulus and neural arch compressive load were obtained from the resulting stress profiles.
Results: No differences in IDP, annulus stress, neural arch load bearing and compressive stiffness were observed between the groups before fracture, after fracture or after vertebroplasty (p> 0.05). After fracture, IDP decreased from 1.02 to 0.68 MPa in flexion and from 0.75 to 0.34 MPa in extension (p< 0.05), neural arch load bearing increased from 13% to 37% of the applied load in flexion (p< 0.05), and compressive stiffness decreased from 2441 to 1478 N/mm (p< 0.05). After vertebroplasty, these changes were largely reversed: IDP increased to 0.45 MPa in extension (p< 0.05), neural arch load bearing fell to 20% in flexion (p=0.1), and compressive stiffness increased to 1799 N/mm (p< 0.05).
Conclusion: Vertebroplasty using either Cortoss or Spineplex was equally effective in reversing fracture-induced changes in motion segment mechanics.
Correspondence should be addressed to Ms Alison McGregor, c/o BOA, SBPR at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.
