Abstract
Background: Pain is complex and multifaceted. We can convey information about pain by communicating verbally, textually and non-verbally. We investigated the use of pain drawings as an aide to communication and compared it with verbal and other pain measurement tools.
Method: We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of pain patients. Data were analysed using the ‘Framework Approach’.
Results: Aches and pains are seen as an increasing continuum, aches distract people, pain stops them doing things. As pain progresses along the continuum patients pain reports progress from verbal through textual to visual representation. Verbal and textual communication about pain was inconsistent, especially for those with multi site pain. Visual communication was more about significant pain, verbal covered the range. As pain worsened so did the complexity, the need for help, life change and communication all increased. Current measuring tools do not seem adequate to assess multi site pain, transient pain and pain with movement.
Conclusions: Two methods of describing pain exist, clinical (physical symptoms) and behavioural (effect on life). Patients felt confident communicating about the latter but perceived a need for active help by the clinician for the former.
The effect of pain on lifestyle is paramount to the patient, physical symptoms for the clinician. Acknowledging this disparity may reduce frustration experienced in consultations as both have different communication and management needs. Indicating treatment success by focusing on lifestyle improvement in patients rather than reductions in physical symptoms may be more appropriate.
Correspondence should be addressed to Ms Alison McGregor, c/o BOA, SBPR at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.
