Abstract
Hips and knees are commonly replaced joints for which several types of prostheses are available. As newer versions of the prostheses are brought in, older versions are phased out. When revision is for an isolated component failure as in, wear of acetabular cup, isolated revision of the acetabular cup is an accepted procedure. If the plan is to revise just the isolated component then that particular model of prosthesis should still be available.
In an attempt to check the availability of revision components for joint replacements we wrote to ten prostheses manufacturers enquiring the availability of prosthetic components. To have a comparison, we also wrote to eighteen leading car manufacturers enquiring about the duration and any guarantees on the availability of car spare parts.
From our survey we found that the availability of the revision implants was satisfactory in that all the prostheses manufacturers were eager to provide as much assistance as possible. The draw back is that there are no regulations to ensure the availability of these prosthetic components for any length of time after discontinuation of a particular model.
The car manufacturers are not under any obligation to provide spare parts for discontinued models. The argument put forward by some manufacturers for providing spare parts up to ten years from discontinuing the model was that “it would not reflect well on the company” if it were for any lesser length of time.
Conclusion: At present though there are no regulations on the time period of availability of total joint prosthetic components. The manufacturers have taken it upon themselves to provide the prosthetic components whenever a specific request is made. If the manufacturers say they can not provide the implants there is nothing in the governmental regulations that provide for recourse.
Theses abstracts were prepared by Mr Peter Kay. Correspondence should be address to him at The Hip Centre, Wrightington Hospital, Appley Bridge, Wigan, Lancashire WN6 9EP.
