AN AUDIT OF GP’S REFERRAL OF HIP REPLACEMENT PROBLEMS – 1207 GP’S QUESTIONED ACROSS THREE HEALTH REGIONS

Abstract

In the future, registration with a surgical speciality may require no more than the demonstration of core knowledge in the generality of that speciality and in the diagnosis and management of the related acute conditions. Sub-speciality training will be recognised separately. Rationalisation of referral patterns would then require that primary care practitioners are aware of these special abilities.

A questionnaire was sent to 1207 General Practitioners in the Avon, Leicestershire and Central London regions. The response rate was 86.2% (n = 1040). Views were sought on the management and referral of patients experiencing problems with existing hip replacements. These included the use of pre referral radiographs, whether practitioners would preferentially refer to a specialist hip surgeon and whether they believed that referral to a generalist could compromise patient care.

The majority GP’s arranged pre referral radiographs (84.2%). A third (34.2%) indicated that they would refer to any orthopaedic surgeon. 50.0% felt that outcome could be compromised if the patient was seen by an orthopaedic surgeon without a special interest in hip surgery.

There appears to be a need for more scientific information for GP’s and an agreed referral protocol. It is expected that rationalisation the referral system would lead to closer matching of patients needs with specialists’ abilities.