Abstract
Purpose: Injury of both cruciate ligaments raises difficult therapeutic problems in trauma victims. The severity of such lesions is related to the context of multiple trauma and to the general regional context associating vascular and neurological injury. Therapeutic management should be multidisciplinary to determine the appropriate strategy. Orthopaedic treatment should take into account the different diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. The purpose of this work was to detail ligament injuries observed and to assess results of treatments proposed.
Material and methods: This retrospective series included 20 patients (14 men and 6 women), mean age 33 years (18–54). Five had multiple trauma with head injuries and multiple fractures. The initial diagnosis was traumatic knee dislocation in 14 patients. Seven patients underwent emergency vascular explorations with subsequent femoropopliteal bypass (n=3). Neurological lesions included three cases of complete section of the lateral popliteal sciatic. Orthopaedic treatment was used in three cases. We used external fixation for two months on the average in three patients. Six others underwent surgery (less than eight days after injury) after obtaining an MRI. The surgical strategy was based on several arguments: age, general status, level of the ligament injury. Three patients underwent secondary surgery on the anterior cruciate ligament. Outcome was assessed at a mean follow-up of 36 months (20–60). The clinical assessment of the objective result was based on frontal and sagittal laxity. The subjective result and the level of sports activities were also recorded. Radiographically, we studied the standard x-rays in single leg stance and also the stress images using telos with anterior then posterior drawer.
Results: Excepting one case of amputation necessary due to the vascular and nervous injuries, orthopaedic treatment allowed an acceptable functional result in sedentary patients: good frontal stability and minimal anteroposterior residual laxity. Fourteen athletes underwent emergency surgery to repair the posterior cruciate ligament: posterior approaches in eight knees with injury of the floor with no posterior drawer at last follow-up; anterior approaches in six knees for suture of the posterior cruciate ligament and insertion of a synthetic ligament tutor with anterior cruciate ligament repair during the same operative time (two floor reinsertions, one patellar tendon plasty, and three Cho plasties). The stability of the posterior pivot was excellent but the tibial reinsertions of the anterior cruciate ligament failed. Seven knees required mobilisation under general anaesthesia 2.5 months later. Three knees underwent secondary anterior cruciate repair using the Kenneth Jones technique with negative Lachmann at last follow-up.
Discussion: Excepting vascular and neurological emergencies dictating the initial therapeutic attitude, our orthopaedic management was based on a detailed identification of the lesion using emergency MRI: anterior or posterior approach, anterior cruciate repair technique dependng on association with peripheral ligament injury. Good results in terms of posterior laxity were achieved in this series, confirming the importance of emergency repair of the posterior cruciate. If the medial ligaments are intact, the anterior cruciate can be repaired in the emergency setting with a Cho plasy. In other situations, we prefer waiting before surgical repair of the anterior pivot.
The abstracts were prepared by Docteur Jean Barthas. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Secrétariat de la Société S.O.F.C.O.T., 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris.
