Abstract
Purpose: Maisonneuve fracture is a rare variant of malleolar fractures. Standard surgical care is not well defined. We performed a retrospective analysis of operated patients to propose a system to determine adequate care as a function of the type of lesions observed.
Material and methods: This retrospective analysis involved 20 patients who underwent surgery for Mai-sonneuve fracture between 1989 and 2000. Mean age was 42 years at surgery. Male gender predominated (16 patients). Seven patients (group 1) were treated without a syndesmodesis screw (osteosynthesis of the medial malleolus in six cases and suture of the medial collateral ligament in one). Thirteen patients (group 2) were treated via a first lateral approach and a syndesmodesis screw followed by a complementary medial approach in seven cases (two cases of medial malleolus osteocynthesis and five cases of medial collateral ligament suture). The Duquennoy functional score was determined at last follow-up. Quality of the reduction and presence of degenerative disease were determined on standard x-rays and computed tomographies.
Results: Mean follow-up was four years nine months (range 1–10 years). No case of tibiotalar diastasis was observed at at least one year. Among the five patients reviewed clinically, outcome was excellent in four and fair in one. In group 2 (syndesmodesis), we found two cases of residual diastasis and two cases of tight syndesmosis at at least one year. Among the nine patients reviewed clinically, outcome was excellent in three and fair or poor in six.
Discussion: This retrospective analysis collaborates the few data in the literature on Maisonneuve fractures. Ligament injury has varied greatly (with or without tear of the medial lateral ligament, more or less full thickness rupture of the interosseous membrane). In our experience, it is always difficult to reduce the diastasis via the primary lateral approach. Conversely, the primary medial approach has, after testing, enabled eliminating the syndesmodesis screw, with its recognised deleterious effects, in seven cases.
Conclusion: Due to the diversity of the ligament injuries encountered in patients with Maisonneuve fractures, we have adopted the following surgical strategy. If there is diastasis, after confirmation of any injury to the medical compartment, medial approach to suture the medial collateral ligament or osteosynthesis of the medial malleolus: in the case of diastasis reduction, we advocate a syndesmodesis screw; if diastasis persists, a secondary lateral approach is useful to reduce the medial malleolar rotation and insert a syndesmodesis screw.
The abstracts were prepared by Docteur Jean Barthas. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Secrétariat de la Société S.O.F.C.O.T., 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris.
