Abstract
Purpose: Surgery is required for primary tumours invading the sacroiliac joint. The purpose of the present work was to analyse results obtained with surgical treatment in order to better ascertain indications.
Material and methods: Forty patients (24 men and 16 women), mean age 24 years (range 12–56) underwent surgery for high-grade sarcoma (n=30, osteosarcoma 12, Ewing 13, chondrosarcoma five) or more differentiated tumours (n=10, low-grade S chondrosarcoma five, fibro-sarcoma two, others three). Resection was achieved in 37 cases via two approaches and via a lateral approach in three. Resection involved vertical sacrectomy either via the homolateral foramen (n=27) or via the midline (n=10). Reconstruction consisted in stabilising the iliosa-cral assembly generally associated with vertebral osteo-synthesis, an autologous graft in 36 cases, cement in one, and an allograft in three. Functional outcome was assessed with the MSTS (Enneking).
Results: There were three infections (all three with extensive lateral approach) and five cases of postoperative lumbosacral trunk palsy. Late complications were three cases of spondylolisthesis and eight nonunions. Twenty patients died (eight local recurrences, ten metastases, one chemotherapy toxicity, one undetermined cause). Sixteen patients achieved complete remission at six years (follow-up 2–16 years) and four patients were lost to follow-up. Functional outcome was very good in eight, good in ten, fair in twelve, and poor in ten. Survival was 40% among patients with malignant tumours (38 patients) but only 20% for those with osteosarcomas.
Discussion: Technical improvements (combined approach rather than wide lateral approach and omentum flap) have allowed a reduction of cutaneous and infectious complications. Mechanical complications can be prevented by systematic lumbosacral fusion on the side opposite the resection reconstruction. This provides good functional results despite sacrificing a hemi-sacral plexus if the lumbo-sacral trunk is preserved. Reconstruction after extension of the resection to the acetabulum raises an unresolved problem and yields mediocre results. The quality of the surgical resection is determinant since risk of local recurrence is 8/100 after a contaminated resection edge.
Conclusion: Surgical resection of sacroiliac tumours is a source of numerous complications despite real technical improvements. This approach can be proposed if carcinological resection can be reasonably achieved. Local control is very poor in case of large osteo-osteogenic sarcomas.
The abstracts were prepared by Docteur Jean Barthas. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Secrétariat de la Société S.O.F.C.O.T., 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris.
