Abstract
Purpose: Meralgia paraesthetica is usually caused by entrapment of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) at the inguinal ligament. We present our experience with 114 patients who underwent surgical management for meralgia paraesthetica.
Material: We reviewed 114 patients (48 men, 66 women, five bilateral cases) who underwent surgery for meralgia paraesthetica between 1987 and 1999; local anaesthesia was used for neurolysis in most cases. We identified five aetiologies: idiopathic (n=69, three bilateral), abdominal surgery (n=19), iliac graft harvesting (n=12, one bilateral), hip surgery (n=7), trauma (n=7, one bilateral).
Methods: We analysed outcome at more than two years follow-up for the entire series and by aetiology using a standard 12-point evaluation scale accounting for residual pain, sensorial disorders, and patient satisfaction.
Results: The overall results were good, mean score 9/12 (range 1–12). Ninety-two patients were very satisfied or satisfied. Among the 27 patients who were not satisfied, five developed recurrence. Mean time to full pain relief was 70 days (range 1 – 364 days). Recovery of thigh sensitivity was noted at 128 days (range 1 – 364).
Discussion: The essential criteria of poor prognosis were duration of the meralgia before surgery and its aetiology. Neurolysis of an LFCN injured by trauma or iliac graft harvesting provided less satisfactory results (scores 7 and 6 respectively) than for idopathic meralgia paraesthetica or abdominal-surgery injury (scores 9 and 10 respectively). Eight of the neurolysis procedures in this series did not provide satisfactory results (score 5).
Conclusion: Neurolysis appears to be the surgical treatment of choice for mearlgia paraesthetica. In skilled hands, neurolysis can be performed under local anaesthesia, although certain difficulties can be encountered: obesity, modified anatomy due to prior operations, nerve variability (frequent). Knowledge of these different elements is essential not only to achieve neurolysis but also prevent iatrogenic injury.
The abstracts were prepared by Docteur Jean Barthas. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Secrétariat de la Société S.O.F.C.O.T., 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris.
