Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

INFECTION AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR MALIGNANT TUMOUR IN CHILDREN: AETIOLOGY, TREATMENT, AND PROGNOSIS



Abstract

Purpose: Infection after resection and total knee arthoplasty for malignant bone tumours in children is a serious complication which may compromise limb salvage. The purpose of this work was to study the aetiology, treatment and prognosis of this event.

Material and methods: Among the 169 total knee arthroplasties performed for malignant bone tumours between 1981 and 1999, we selected 17 patients meeting the following criteria: proven infection with identified germ on deep samples or presence of a fistula more than two years after surgery. All of the patients had osteogenic sarcomas (excluding Ewing sarcomas which account for 30% of the tumours in this localisation). The bone tumour involved the femur (n=11) or the tibia (n=6) and required extraarticular (n=14) or transarticular (n=2) resection. Infections were primary (n=9) developing after the first operation, or secondary (n=8) to surgical revision in six, joint wound in one, or haematogeneous dissemination in one patient. The causal germ was identified in thirteen patients (76%) and was a staphylococcus in all cases. Treatment included systemic antibiotics and lavage (n=10), one-procedure change in prosthesis (n=3), removal of the implant with replacement by a spacer (n=2), surgical abstention (n=2), or amputation (n=1).

Results: Mean follow-up was eight years (2 – 16 years). On the average, treatment of infection lasted 51 months and required a 3.9 surgical interventions. At last follow-up, infection was considered cured in 70% of the patients who were free of clinical or laboratory signs of infection without antibiotics for at least one year. The arthroplasty could be preserved in one-third of the cases (22% of the primary infections and 50% of the secondary infections). Another treatment, arthrodesis (n=6), Borggreve procedure (n=1), or amputation (n=4), was given in the other two-thirds.

Discussion: The 10% complication rate observed here is in agreement with data in the literature. Development of primary infection is influenced more by the histology of the tumour and the presence of skin wounds (methotrexate) than by tumour site or type of resection. The diagnosis of primary infection is made late, often at the end of the postoperative chemotherapy protocol. Changing the implant is the ideal treatment. Secondary infection is characteristically less difficult to diagnose; infection is recognised earlier and the chances of preserving the implant are better.

The abstracts were prepared by Docteur Jean Barthas. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Secrétariat de la Société S.O.F.C.O.T., 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris.