Abstract
In clinical studies of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), polished stems produce less slippage at the bone-cement interface than roughened stems. Our objective is to assess the effect of stem-cement debonding on the bone-cement interface shear behaviour of hip implants using simplified axisymmetric stem-cement-aluminum models.
We emulated the femoral stems using stainless steel tapered plugs with either a rough (i.e. bonded) or smooth (i.e. unbonded) surface finish. Three different taper angles (5°, 7.5°, 10°) were used for the unbonded constructs. Non-tapered and tapered (7.5°) aluminum shells were used to emulate the diaphyseal and metaphyseal segments of the femur. In all cases, the cement-aluminum interface was designed to have the same shear strength as has been reported for bone-cement interfaces (~8 MPa). The test involved applying axial compressive loading at a rate of 0.02 mm/s until failure. Six specimens were tested for each combination of the parameters.
The unbonded stems sustained about twice as much load as the bonded stem, regardless of taper angle, and the metaphyseal model carried 35-50% greater loads than the diaphyseal models before shear failure or slippage. The unbonded constructs reached peak load with excessive displacement due to creep of the cement mantle while the bonded constructs failed in shear at the cement-aluminum interface. This result supports the hypothesis that the wedging forces created in the unbonded construct increase the compression forces across the aluminum-cement interface, thereby increasing its shear resistance. A finite element analysis predicted that the cement could withstand the hoop stress under these loading circumstances and this prediction was confirmed by visual inspection of the cement after each test.
Our results suggest that smooth or unbonded stems should sustain less slippage and shear damage at the bone-cement interface than roughened or bonded stems due to the wedge-induced compressive stress; this increased load capacity will be particularly valuable when the condition of the bone-cement interface is suboptimal.
The abstracts were prepared by Nico Verdoschot. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Orthopaedie / CSS1, Huispost 800, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Th. Craanenlaan 7, 6525 GH Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
