Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

POLYETHYLENE MOVEMENT IN MOBILE-BEARING, POSTERIOR-STABILISED KNEE PROSTHESIS



Abstract

The benefit of mobile-bearing mechanism in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been controversial. The aim of this paper is to analyse the rotation of polyethylene (PE) and its effect on the range of motion (ROM) in mobile-bearing, posterior stabilised TKA (LPS-Flex™, Zimmer Co. Ltd.).

Thirty-four consecutive PS-Flex™ TKAs (28 patients) were analysed. Three tantalum markers were inserted in the PE and the tibia (one for medial side and two for lateral side; total six markers). The rotation of the PE and the tibia was analysed in fluoroscopically-controlled radiograph taken at one years in full extension, 90 degrees flexion and passive maximum flexion. The markers in the tibia were identifiable in 19 knees and the analysis was based on these knees.

The tibia rotated internally relative to the femur by 7.1± 5.2 degrees (mean ± SD, range −1 to 20 degrees). The amount of tibial rotation has no correlation to ROM. The rotation of the PE relative to the femur was unpredictable showing three knees with external rotation and four knees without rotation (Average; 4.0 ± 4.5 degrees internal rotation). The rotation of the PE on the tibia was 4.2± 5.2 degrees and seven knees (37 %) showed no rotation and 12 knees (63 %) showed less than 5 degrees rotation. There was a positive correlation between the amount of PE rotation on the tibia and ROM, which approached to statistical significance (p = 0.0684).

This study has demonstrated that the rotation of the PE on the tibial tray is generally small (< 5 degrees). Because not tibial internal rotation but PE movement on the tibia correlated to ROM, the essential benefit of the mobile-bearing mechanism could be to compensate the rotational mismatch between the components rather than to reproduce normal knee kinematics.

The abstracts were prepared by Nico Verdoschot. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Orthopaedie / CSS1, Huispost 800, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Th. Craanenlaan 7, 6525 GH Nijmegen, The Netherlands.