Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

WEAR IN POLYETHYLENE KNEE INSERTS: EFFECT OF CONTACT STRESSES, SLIDING VELOCITY AND CROSSING WEAR PATHS



Abstract

This study measured polyethylene wear and correlated it with design features such as tibiofemoral conformity and contact areas.

Two femoral component designs were tested in a knee wear simulator. The femoral condyles of design A were flat-on-flat in the coronal plane, while those of design B were curved-on-curved. These femoral components were tested with two inserts. Insert PLI had a posterior lip, while insert C had a more curved sagital geometry, to improve stability in the anteroposterior direction. All components were tested for up to five million cycles in bovine serum lubricant. Triaxial forces were monitored to ensure that loading conditions were similar in all combinations tested. Gravimetric wear measurements were made at 500 000 cycle intervals. Contact stresses were measured using pressure sensitive film and dynamic finite element analysis.

Contact stresses were 22% higher for inserts tested with design A compared to design B. Sliding distance, sliding velocity, and patterns of crossing motion were found to be comparable between the two femoral designs. Inserts tested with design A wore significantly more (mean 10.9 mg/million cycles) than design B (mean 5.71 mg/million cycles, p < 0.001). No appreciable differences were found between wear rates of insert PLI and insert C.

Component design can have a significant impact on polyethylene wear rate. Careful control of kinematic and loading conditions allowed for comparison between specific design features. Increase in tibio-femoral contact area led to reduction of contact stresses, which was reflected in the reduced wear rate.

The abstracts were prepared by Nico Verdoschot. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Orthopaedie / CSS1, Huispost 800, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Th. Craanenlaan 7, 6525 GH Nijmegen, The Netherlands.