Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
You currently have no access to view or download this content. Please log in with your institutional or personal account if you should have access to through either of these
The Bone & Joint Journal Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from The Bone & Joint Journal

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Research

Properties of growing trabecular ovine bone

PART I: MECHANICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES



Download PDF

Abstract

Our aim was to determine the relationship between age and the mechanical and physical properties of trabecular bone, to describe the patterns in which the variations in these properties take place, and to investigate the influence of the physical properties on the mechanical characteristics of trabecular bone during growth. We used 30 lambs in three age groups and 20 sheep in two age groups. Cubes of subchondral bone were cut from the proximal tibia according to a standardised protocol. We performed non-destructive compression tests of the specimens in three orthogonal directions and compression tests to failure in the axial direction. The physical properties of the specimens were also determined. The data were correlated with age and compared in skeletally immature and mature animals. Multiple regression analyses were performed between the mechanical and the physical properties.

Age correlated positively with elastic modulus, bone strength, energy absorption to failure, elastic energy, mechanical anisotropy ratio, tissue density, apparent density, apparent ash density, and bone mineral content, and inversely with ultimate strain, viscoelastic energy absorption, relative energy loss, the collagen content of bone and the percentage porosity. The values of all variables were significantly different in the skeletally mature and immature groups. The apparent density of trabecular bone tissue was found to be the major predictor of its compressive mechanical properties. Together with the content of bone muscle and bone collagen, the apparent density could explain 84% of the variation in the elastic modulus, whereas only a small portion of the variation in ultimate strain could be explained by the variation in apparent density.


Correspondence should be sent to Dr A. Nafei at Harald Kiddes Vej 55, DK-8230 Aabyhoej, Denmark.

For access options please click here