Abstract
1. Previous immunological studies have shown that homografts of fresh marrow-free iliac bone are only weakly, if at all, antigenic.
2. In view of this finding an attempt was made to produce a foreign bone graft capable of forming new bone as readily as an iliac autograft by the following method. Living cells of high osteogenic potential and of autologous type were introduced into the graft by combining homologous fresh marrow-free iliac bone with the animal's own red marrow to form a fresh composite homograft-autograft of cancellous bone.
3. Such fresh composite homograft-autografts were inserted into a muscular site in Wistar rats and removed for microscopical examination at intervals of one to seven days and at two, six and twelve weeks after transplantation.
4. It is found that bone and marrow together as a fresh composite homograft-autograft form considerably more new bone than do either of the components of the graft transplanted separately. Homografts of fresh marrow-free iliac bone form, in general, a small amount of early phase and late phase new bone. Autografts of red marrow transplanted alone to a muscular site formed new bone in thirteen to thirty experiments (43 per cent).
5. The stimulus to osteogenesis, and the cellular source of osteoblasts, in marrow autografts is discussed in the light of present knowledge. The concept is suggested that after its transplantation there develops in marrow an inductive system leading to osteoblastic differentiation and bone formation. It is proposed that the necrosis of a portion of a marrow graft liberates osteogenic substances which are taken up by primitive wandering cells derived from littoral cells lining the vascular sinusoids of the surviving portions of the marrow which are induced, thereby, to differentiate as osteoblasts.
6. The cellular source of osteoblasts in a fresh composite homograft-autograft of cancellous bone is discussed. It is deduced that the new bone is derived mainly from the contained marrow of the graft, by mechanisms similar to those leading to osteoblastic differentiation in transplanted autografts of marrow.
7. The stimulus to the greater formation of new bone by fresh composite autograft-homografts than by autografts of marrow transplanted alone is discussed. Two explanations are suggested: 1) a more extensive necrosis of marrow in a composite homograft-autograft than in marrow transplanted alone; and 2) an inductive effect of bone upon marrow.
8. The new bone formed by autografts of fresh marrow-containing iliac bone, it is concluded, is derived not only from osteoblasts on the surfaces of the grafted bone but also from primitive wandering cells derived from littoral cells lining the vascular sinusoids of the surviving portions of its marrow.
9. Mechanisms which may play a role in the histogenesis of woven bone are discussed.
10. The significance of the relation of bone and marrow is considered briefly in the light of knowledge concerning the venous patterns of bone and marrow.
