Abstract
Professor Paul Brand draws attention to an error in the report of a meeting of the Orthopaedic Section of the Association of Surgeons of India submitted to this journal and published in our issue of May 1962. The observations then reported were not made by him but in his absence by another contributor. The particular paragraph to which Professor Brand wishes to draw attention read: "Lately he had been using a wrist flexor tendon as the motor unit for the transplant, instead of the extensor carpi ulnaris, and he felt that the flexor tendon was the better."
Professor Brand writes: "I have not been using a wrist flexor tendon as the motor unit. I used one many years ago, and found it is very definitely inferior. I have never used the extensor carpi ulnaris. I assume that the sentence should have read: ‘Lately he has been using the extensor carpi radialis longus as the motor unit for the transplant instead of the extensor carpi radialis brevis, and has taken the graft around the radial side of the forearm and through the carpal tunnel to reach the lumbrical insertions along the lumbrical canals. He found the results were better with this method.’"
