header advert
You currently have no access to view or download this content. Please log in with your institutional or personal account if you should have access to through either of these
The Bone & Joint Journal Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from The Bone & Joint Journal

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Get Access locked padlock

POSTERIOR FUSION OF THE SPINE FOR SCOLIOSIS



Download PDF

Abstract

1. Posterior fusion of the spine in scoliosis cannot be relied upon to maintain correction of the curve or to prevent progression of a vicious resistant curve. It can, however, hold to some extent the correction of a mobile curve and the compensation of a fixed curve.

2. Despite generally poor results as assessed radiographically, the clinical improvement is often gratifying. Most patients claim to be greatly improved: the spine feels stronger, there is less fatigue, and balance is better controlled. Moreover, visible deformity may be improved markedly even though the anatomical correction as observed radiographically is slight (Figs. l0 and 11).

3. It is believed that the true cause of relapse is that the bone formed from sliver grafts remains immature for a long time. Even when incorporated with the immature bone of the child's spine or the mature bone of the adult spine, it remains soft and resilient. When subjected to the stresses and strains of weight bearing and gravity, and then to the unnatural forces which initiated or perpetuated the scoliosis, this immature bone undergoes remodelling to Wolff's Law—like the neck of the femur after slipping of the upper femoral epiphysis. The forces that alter the grafted bone are not only lateral forces but also—perhaps more important—rotational forces. There seems to be a definite link between the degree of rotation and the amount of relapse, correction being maintained best when rotation is least.

For access options please click here