Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from The Bone & Joint Journal
Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings
View my account settings
A modular femoral head–neck junction has practical
advantages in total hip replacement. Taper fretting and corrosion
have so far been an infrequent cause of revision. The role of design
and manufacturing variables continues to be debated. Over the past
decade several changes in technology and clinical practice might
result in an increase in clinically significant taper fretting and
corrosion. Those factors include an increased usage of large diameter
(36 mm) heads, reduced femoral neck and taper dimensions, greater
variability in taper assembly with smaller incision surgery, and
higher taper stresses due to increased patient weight and/or physical
activity. Additional studies are needed to determine the role of
taper assembly compared with design, manufacturing and other implant
variables. Cite this article:
Most hip fractures treated with modern internal
fixation techniques will heal. However, failures occasionally occur and
require revision procedures. Salvage strategies employed during
revision are based on whether the fixation failure occurs in the
femoral neck, or in the intertrochanteric region. Patient age and
remaining bone stock also influence decision making. For fractures
in young patients, efforts are generally focused on preserving the
native femoral head via osteotomies and repeat internal fixation.
For failures in older patients, some kind of hip replacement is
usually selected. Disuse osteopenia, deformity, bone loss, and stress-risers
from previous internal fixation devices all pose technical challenges
to successful reconstruction. Attention to detail is important in
order to minimise complications. In the majority of cases, good
outcomes have been reported for the various salvage strategies. Cite this article:
Total hip replacement (THR) after acetabular
fracture presents unique challenges to the orthopaedic surgeon.
The majority of patients can be treated with a standard THR, resulting
in a very reasonable outcome. Technical challenges however include
infection, residual pelvic deformity, acetabular bone loss with
ununited fractures, osteonecrosis of bone fragments, retained metalwork,
heterotopic ossification, dealing with the sciatic nerve, and the
difficulties of obtaining long-term acetabular component fixation.
Indications for an acute THR include young patients with both femoral
head and acetabular involvement with severe comminution that cannot
be reconstructed, and the elderly, with severe bony comminution.
The outcomes of THR for established post-traumatic arthritis include
excellent pain relief and functional improvements. The use of modern
implants and alternative bearing surfaces should improve outcomes
further. Cite this article:
Tapered, fluted, modular, titanium stems are
increasingly popular in the operative management of Vancouver B2 and
selected B3 peri-prosthetic femoral fractures. We have reviewed
the results at our institution looking at stem survival and clinical
outcomes and compared this with reported outcomes in the literature.
Stem survival at a mean of 54 months was 96% in our series and 97%
for combined published cases. Review of radiology showed maintenance
or improvement of bone stock in 89% of cases with high rates of
femoral union. Favourable clinical outcome scores have reported
by several authors. No difference in survival or clinical scores
was observed between B2 and B3 fractures. Tapered stems are a useful
option in revision for femoral fracture across the spectrum of femoral
bone deficiency. Cite this article:
The treatment of hip dysplasia should be customised
for patients individually based on radiographic findings, patient
age, and the patient’s overall articular cartilage status. In many
patients, restoration of hip anatomy as close to normal as possible
with a PAO is the treatment of choice. Cite this article:
Young adults with hip pain secondary to femoroacetabular
impingement (FAI) are rapidly being recognised as an important cohort
of orthopaedic patients. Interest in FAI has intensified over the
last decade since its recognition as a precursor to arthritis of
the hip and the number of publications related to the topic has
increased exponentially in the last decade. Although not all patients
with abnormal hip morphology develop osteoarthritis (OA), those
with FAI-related joint damage rapidly develop premature OA. There
are no explicit diagnostic criteria or definitive indications for
surgical intervention in FAI. Surgery for symptomatic FAI appears
to be most effective in younger individuals who have not yet developed
irreversible OA. The difficulty in predicting prognosis in FAI means
that avoiding unnecessary surgery in asymptomatic individuals, while
undertaking intervention in those that are likely to develop premature
OA poses a considerable dilemma. FAI treatment in the past has focused
on open procedures that carry a potential risk of complications. Recent developments in hip arthroscopy have facilitated a minimally
invasive approach to the management of FAI with few complications
in expert hands. Acetabular labral preservation and repair appears
to provide superior results when compared with debridement alone.
Arthroscopic correction of structural abnormalities is increasingly becoming
the standard treatment for FAI, however there is a paucity of high-level
evidence comparing open and arthroscopic techniques in patients
with similar FAI morphology and degree of associated articular cartilage damage.
Further research is needed to develop an understanding of the natural
course of FAI, the definitive indications for surgery and the long-term
outcomes. Cite this article:
Total hip replacement for developmental hip dysplasia
is challenging. The anatomical deformities on the acetabular and
femoral sides are difficult to predict. The Crowe classification
is usually used to describe these cases – however, it is not a very
helpful tool for pre-operative planning. Small acetabular components,
acetabular augments, and modular femoral components should be available
for all cases. Regardless of the Crowe classification, the surgeon must
be prepared to perform a femoral osteotomy for shortening, or to
correct rotation, and/or angulation. Cite this article:
There are few reports describing the technique
of managing acetabular protrusio in primary total hip replacement. Most
are small series with different methods of addressing the challenges
of significant medial and proximal migration of the joint centre,
deficient medial bone and reduced peripheral bony support to the
acetabular component. We describe our technique and the clinical
and radiological outcome of using impacted morsellised autograft
with a porous-coated cementless cup in 30 primary THRs with mild
(n = 8), moderate (n = 10) and severe (n = 12) grades of acetabular
protrusio. The mean Harris hip score had improved from 52 pre-operatively
to 85 at a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (2 to 10). At final follow-up,
27 hips (90%) had a good or excellent result, two (7%) had a fair
result and one (3%) had a poor result. All bone grafts had united
by the sixth post-operative month and none of the hips showed any
radiological evidence of recurrence of protrusio, osteolysis or
loosening. By using impacted morsellised autograft and cementless
acetabular components it was possible to achieve restoration of
hip mechanics, provide a biological solution to bone deficiency
and ensure long-term fixation without recurrence in arthritic hips
with protrusio undergoing THR. Cite this article:
Down’s syndrome is associated with a number of
musculoskeletal abnormalities, some of which predispose patients
to early symptomatic arthritis of the hip. The purpose of the present
study was to review the general and hip-specific factors potentially
compromising total hip replacement (THR) in patients with Down’s
syndrome, as well as to summarise both the surgical techniques that
may anticipate the potential adverse impact of these factors and
the clinical results reported to date. A search of the literature
was performed, and the findings further informed by the authors’
clinical experience, as well as that of the hip replacement in Down
Syndrome study group. The general factors identified include a high
incidence of ligamentous laxity, as well as associated muscle hypotonia
and gait abnormalities. Hip-specific factors include: a high incidence
of hip dysplasia, as well as a number of other acetabular, femoral
and combined femoroacetabular anatomical variations. Four studies
encompassing 42 hips, which reported the clinical outcomes of THR
in patients with Down’s syndrome, were identified. All patients
were successfully treated with standard acetabular and femoral components.
The use of supplementary acetabular screw fixation to enhance component
stability was frequently reported. The use of constrained liners
to treat intra-operative instability occurred in eight hips. Survival
rates of between 81% and 100% at a mean follow-up of 105 months
(6 to 292) are encouraging. Overall, while THR in patients with
Down’s syndrome does present some unique challenges, the overall
clinical results are good, providing these patients with reliable
pain relief and good function. Cite this article:
Symptomatic hip osteonecrosis is a disabling
condition with a poorly understood aetiology and pathogenesis. Numerous
treatment options for hip osteonecrosis are described, which include
non-operative management and joint preserving procedures, as well
as total hip replacement (THR). Non-operative or joint preserving
treatment may improve outcomes when an early diagnosis is made before
the lesion has become too large or there is radiographic evidence
of femoral head collapse. The presence of a crescent sign, femoral
head flattening, and acetabular involvement indicate a more advanced-stage
disease in which joint preserving options are less effective than
THR. Since many patients present after disease progression, primary
THR is often the only reliable treatment option available. Prior
to the 1990s, outcomes of THR for osteonecrosis were poor. However,
according to recent reports and systemic reviews, it is encouraging
that with the introduction of newer ceramic and/or highly cross-linked
polyethylene bearings as well as highly-porous fixation interfaces,
THR appears to be a reliable option in the management of end-stage
arthritis following hip osteonecrosis in this historically difficult
to treat patient population. Cite this article:
There is a North Atlantic divide, with cementless
femoral stems being used more frequently in the USA and cemented
stems being used more frequently in many countries in Europe. This
is primarily because different cemented stems have been used on
different sides of the Atlantic and the results of the cemented
stems in the US have often been poor, whereas the results of the
stems used in Europe have been good. In the National registers in
Europe, cemented stems have tended to achieve better results than
cementless. Cite this article:
Cementless femoral stems are currently preferred
for total hip replacement (THR) in the United States. Improvements
in stem design, instrumentation and surgical technique have made
this technology highly successful, reproducible, and applicable
to the vast majority of patients requiring a THR. However, there
are ongoing developments in some aspects of stem design that influence
clinical results, the incidence of complications and their inherent adaptability
in accommodating the needs of individual patients. Here we examine
some of these design features. Cite this article:
Conventional uncemented femoral implants provide
dependable long-term fixation in patients with a wide range of functional
requirements. Yet challenges associated with proximal–distal femoral
dimensional mismatch, preservation of bone stock, and minimally
invasive approaches have led to exploration into alternative implant designs.
Short stem designs focusing on a stable metaphyseal fit have emerged
to address these issues in total hip replacement (THR). Uncemented
metaphyseal-engaging short stem implants are stable and are associated
with proximal bone remodeling closer to the metaphysis when compared
with conventional stems and they also have comparable clinical performances.
Short stem metaphyseal-engaging implants can meet the goals of a
successful THR, including tolerating a high level of patient function,
as well as durable fixation. Cite this article:
Large ceramic femoral heads offer several advantages
that are potentially advantageous to patients undergoing both primary
and revision total hip replacement. Many high-quality studies have
demonstrated the benefit of large femoral heads in reducing post-operative instability.
Ceramic femoral heads may also offer an advantage in reducing polyethylene wear
that has been reported Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:63–6.
Dislocation is one of the most common causes
of patient and surgeon dissatisfaction following hip replacement
and to treat it, the causes must first be understood. Patient factors
include age greater than 70 years, medical comorbidities, female
gender, ligamentous laxity, revision surgery, issues with the abductors,
and patient education. Surgeon factors include the annual quantity
of procedures and experience, the surgical approach, adequate restoration
of femoral offset and leg length, component position, and soft-tissue
or bony impingement. Implant factors include the design of the head
and neck region, and so-called skirts on longer neck lengths. There
should be offset choices available in order to restore soft-tissue
tension. Lipped liners aid in gaining stability, yet if improperly placed
may result in impingement and dislocation. Late dislocation may
result from polyethylene wear, soft-tissue destruction, trochanteric
or abductor disruption and weakness, or infection. Understanding
the causes of hip dislocation facilitates prevention in a majority
of instances. Proper pre-operative planning includes the identification
of patients with a high offset in whom inadequate restoration of
offset will reduce soft-tissue tension and abductor efficiency.
Component position must be accurate to achieve stability without impingement.
Finally, patient education cannot be over-emphasised, as most dislocations occur
early, and are preventable with proper instructions. Cite this article:
Total hip replacement (THR) is a very common
procedure undertaken in up to 285 000 Americans each year. Patient
satisfaction with THR is very high, with improvements in general
health, quality of life, and function while at the same time very
cost effective. Although the majority of patients have a high degree
of satisfaction with their THR, 27% experience some discomfort,
and up to 6% experience severe chronic pain. Although it can be
difficult to diagnose the cause of the pain in these patients, this
clinical issue should be approached systematically and thoroughly.
A detailed history and clinical examination can often provide the
correct diagnosis and guide the appropriate selection of investigations, which
will then serve to confirm the clinical diagnosis made. Cite this article:
Patient safety is a critical issue in elective
total joint replacement surgery. Identifying risk factors that might
predict complications and intensive care unit (ICU) admission proves instrumental
in reducing morbidity and mortality. The institution’s experience
with risk stratification and pre-operative ICU triage has resulted
in a reduction in unplanned ICU admissions and post-operative complications
after total hip replacement. The application of the prediction tools
to total knee replacement has proven less robust so far. This work
also reviews areas for future research in patient safety and cost
containment. Cite this article:
Based on the first implementation of mixing antibiotics
into bone cement in the 1970s, the Endo-Klinik has used one stage
exchange for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in over 85% of cases.
Looking carefully at current literature and guidelines for PJI treatment,
there is no clear evidence that a two stage procedure has a higher
success rate than a one-stage approach. A cemented one-stage exchange
potentially offers certain advantages, mainly based on the need
for only one operative procedure, reduced antibiotics and hospitalisation time.
In order to fulfill a one-stage approach, there are obligatory pre-,
peri- and post-operative details that need to be meticulously respected,
and are described in detail. Essential pre-operative diagnostic
testing is based on the joint aspiration with an exact identification
of any bacteria. The presence of a positive bacterial culture and
respective antibiogram are essential, to specify the antibiotics
to be loaded to the bone cement, which allows a high local antibiotic
elution directly at the surgical side. A specific antibiotic treatment
plan is generated by a microbiologist. The surgical success relies
on the complete removal of all pre-existing hardware, including
cement and restrictors and an aggressive and complete debridement
of any infected soft tissues and bone material. Post-operative systemic
antibiotic administration is usually completed after only ten to
14 days. Cite this article:
Two-stage exchange remains the gold standard
for treatment of peri-prosthetic joint infection after total hip replacement
(THR). In the first stage, all components and associated cement
if present are removed, an aggressive debridement is undertaken
including a complete synovectomy, and an antibiotic-loaded cement
spacer is put in place. Patients are then treated with six weeks
of parenteral antibiotics, followed by an ‘antibiotic free period’
to help ensure the infection has been eradicated. If the clinical
evaluation and serum inflammatory markers suggest the infection
has resolved, then the second stage can be completed, which involves
removal of the cement spacer, repeat debridement, and placement
of a new THR. Cite this article:
Surface hip replacement (SHR) is generally used
in younger, active patients as an alternative conventional total
hip replacement in part because of the ability to preserve femoral
bone. This major benefit of surface replacement will only hold true
if revision procedures of SHRs are found to provide good clinical
results. A retrospective review of SHR revisions between 2007 and 2012
was presented, and the type of revision and aetiologies were recorded.
There were 55 SHR revisions, of which 27 were in women. At a mean
follow-up of 2.3 years (0.72 to 6.4), the mean post-operative Harris
hip score (HHS) was 94.8 (66 to 100). Overall 23 were revised for mechanical
reasons, nine for impingement, 13 for metallosis, nine for unexplained
pain and one for sepsis. Of the type of revision surgery performed,
14 were femoral-only revisions; four were acetabular-only revisions,
and 37 were complete revisions. We did not find that clinical scores were significantly different
between gender or different types of revisions. However, the mean
post-operative HHS was significantly lower in patients revised for
unexplained pain compared with patients revised for mechanical reasons
(86.9 (66 to 100) Based on the overall clinical results, we believe that revision
of SHR can have good or excellent results and warrants a continued
use of the procedure in selected patients. Close monitoring of these
patients facilitates early intervention, as we believe that tissue
damage may be related to the duration of an ongoing problem. There
should be a low threshold to revise a surface replacement if there
is component malposition, rising metal ion levels, or evidence of
soft-tissue abnormalities. Cite this article:
Femoral revision after cemented total hip replacement
(THR) might include technical difficulties, following essential cement
removal, which might lead to further loss of bone and consequently
inadequate fixation of the subsequent revision stem. Femoral impaction allografting has been widely used in revision
surgery for the acetabulum, and subsequently for the femur. In combination
with a primary cemented stem, impaction grafting allows for femoral
bone restoration through incorporation and remodelling of the impacted
morsellized bone graft by the host skeleton. Cavitary bone defects
affecting meta-physis and diaphysis leading to a wide femoral shaft,
are ideal indications for this technique. Cancellous allograft bone
chips of 1 mm to 2 mm size are used, and tapered into the canal
with rods of increasing diameters. To impact the bone chips into
the femoral canal a prosthesis dummy of the same dimensions of the definitive
cemented stem is driven into the femur to ensure that the chips
are very firmly impacted. Finally, a standard stem is cemented into
the neo-medullary canal using bone cement. To date several studies have shown favourable results with this
technique, with some excellent long-term results reported in independent
clinical centres worldwide. Cite this article:
If a surgeon is faced with altered lesser trochanter
anatomy when revising the femoral component in revision total hip
replacement, a peri-prosthetic fracture, or Paprosky type IIIb or
type IV femoral bone loss, a modular tapered stem offers the advantages
of accurately controlling femoral version and length. The splines
of the taper allow rotational control, and improve the fit in femoral
canals with diaphyseal bone loss. In general, two centimetres of diaphyseal
contact is all that is needed to gain stability with modular tapered
stems. By allowing the proximal body trial to rotate on a well-fixed
distal segment during trial reduction, appropriate anteversion can
be obtained in order to improve intra-operative stability, and decrease
the dislocation risk. However, modular stems should not be used for
all femoral revisions, as implant fracture and corrosion at modular
junctions can still occur. Cite this article:
The increasing need for total hip replacement
(THR) in an ageing population will inevitably generate a larger number
of revision procedures. The difficulties encountered in dealing
with the bone deficient acetabulum are amongst the greatest challenges
in hip surgery. The failed acetabular component requires reconstruction
to restore the hip centre and improve joint biomechanics. Impaction
bone grafting is successful in achieving acetabular reconstruction
using both cemented and cementless techniques. Bone graft incorporation
restores bone stock whilst providing good component stability. We
provide a summary of the evidence and current literature regarding impaction
bone grafting using both cemented and cementless techniques in revision
THR. Cite this article:
The conventional method for reconstructing acetabular
bone loss at revision surgery includes using structural bone allograft.
The disadvantages of this technique promoted the advent of metallic
but biocompatible porous implants to fill bone defects enhancing
initial and long-term stability of the acetabular component. This
paper presents the indications, surgical technique and the outcome
of using porous metal acetabular augments for reconstructing acetabular
defects. Cite this article:
Pelvic discontinuity represents a rare but challenging
problem for orthopaedic surgeons. It is most commonly encountered
during revision total hip replacement, but can also result from
an iatrogentic acetabular fracture during hip replacement. The general
principles in management of pelvic discontinuity include restoration
of the continuity between the ilium and the ischium, typically with
some form of plating. Bone grafting is frequently required to restore
pelvic bone stock. The acetabular component is then impacted, typically
using an uncemented, trabecular metal component. Fixation with multiple
supplemental screws is performed. For larger defects, a so-called
‘cup–cage’ reconstruction, or a custom triflange implant may be
required. Pre-operative CT scanning can greatly assist in planning
and evaluating the remaining bone stock available for bony ingrowth.
Generally, good results have been reported for constructs that restore
stability to the pelvis and allow some form of biologic ingrowth. Cite this article:
Hip arthrodesis remains a viable surgical technique
in well selected patients, typically the young manual labourer with
isolated unilateral hip disease. Despite this, its popularity with
patients and surgeons has decreased due to the evolution of hip
replacement, and is seldom chosen by young adult patients today.
The surgeon is more likely to encounter a patient who requests conversion
to total hip replacement (THR). The most common indications are
a painful pseudarthrosis, back pain, ipsilateral knee pain or contralateral
hip pain. Occasionally the patient will request conversion because
of difficulty with activities of daily living, body image and perceived
cosmesis. The technique of conversion and a discussion of the results
are presented. Cite this article:
Total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the most
common operations in orthopaedic surgery worldwide. Despite its
scientific reputation as mainly successful, only 81% to 89% of patients
are satisfied with the final result. Our understanding of this discordance
between patient and surgeon satisfaction is limited. In our experience,
focus on five major factors can improve patient satisfaction rates:
correct patient selection, setting of appropriate expectations,
avoiding preventable complications, knowledge of the finer points
of the operation, and the use of both pre- and post-operative pathways.
Awareness of the existence, as well as the identification of predictors
of patient–surgeon discordance should potentially help with enhancing
patient outcomes. Cite this article:
Isolated patellofemoral arthritis is a common
condition and there are varying opinions on the most effective treatments.
Non-operative and operative treatments have failed to demonstrate
effective long-term treatment for those in an advanced stage of
the condition. Newer designs and increased technology in patellofemoral replacement
(PFR) have produced more consistent outcomes. This has led to a
renewed enthusiasm for this procedure. Newer PFR prostheses have
addressed the patellar maltracking issues plaguing some of the older designs.
Short-term results with contemporary prostheses and new technology
are described here. Cite this article:
Debate has raged over whether a cruciate retaining
(CR) or a posterior stabilised (PS) total knee replacement (TKR) provides
a better range of movement (ROM) for patients. Various sub-sets
of CR design are frequently lumped together when comparing outcomes.
Additionally, multiple factors have been proven to influence the
rate of manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) following TKR. The
purpose of this study was to determine whether different CR bearing
insert designs provide better ROM or different MUA rates. All primary
TKRs performed by two surgeons between March 2006 and March 2009
were reviewed and 2449 CR-TKRs were identified. The same CR femoral
component, instrumentation, and tibial base plate were consistently
used. In 1334 TKRs a CR tibial insert with 3° posterior slope and
no posterior lip was used (CR-S). In 803 there was an insert with
no slope and a small posterior lip (CR-L) and in 312 knees the posterior
cruciate ligament (PCL) was either resected or lax and a deep-dish,
anterior stabilised insert was used (CR-AS). More CR-AS inserts
were used in patients with less pre-operative ROM and greater pre-operative
tibiofemoral deformity and flexion contracture (p <
0.05). The
mean improvement in ROM was highest for the CR-AS inserts (5.9°
(-40° to 55°) Cite this article:
Total knee replacement (TKR) is an operation
that can be performed with or without the use of a tourniquet. Meta-analyses
of the available Level-1 studies have demonstrated that the use
of a tourniquet leads to a significant reduction in blood loss.
The opponents for use of a tourniquet cite development of complications
such as skin bruising, neurovascular injury, and metabolic disturbance
as drawbacks. Although there may certainly be reason for concern
in arteriopathic patients, there is little evidence that routine
use of a tourniquet during TKR results in any of the above complications.
The use of a tourniquet, on the other hand, provides a bloodless
field that allows the surgeon to perform the procedure with expediency
and optimal visualisation. Blood conservation has gained great importance
in recent years due to increased understanding of the problems associated
with blood transfusion, such as increased surgical site infection
(due to immunomodulation effect), increased length of hospital stay
and increased cost. Based on the authors’ understanding of the available
evidence, the routine use of a tourniquet during TKR is justified
as good surgical practice. Cite this article:
Blood loss during total knee replacement (TKR)
remains a significant concern. In this study, 114 patients underwent TKR,
and were divided into two groups based on whether they received
a new generation fibrin sealant intra-operatively, or a local infiltration
containing adrenaline. Groups were then compared for mean calculated
total blood volume (TBV) loss, transfusion rates, and knee range
of movement. Mean TBV loss was similar between groups: fibrin sealant
mean was 705 ml (281 to 1744), local adrenaline mean was 712 ml
(261 to 2308) (p = 0.929). Overall, significantly fewer units of
blood were transfused in the fibrin sealant group (seven units)
compared with the local adrenaline group (15 units) (p = 0.0479).
Per patient transfused, significantly fewer units of blood were transfused
in the fibrin sealant group (1.0 units) compared with the local
adrenaline group (1.67 units) (p = 0.027), suggesting that the fibrin
sealant may reduce the need for multiple unit transfusions. Knee
range of movement was similar between groups. From our results,
it appears that application of this newer fibrin sealant results
in blood loss and transfusion rates that are low and similar to
previously applied fibrin sealants. Cite this article:
At least four ways have been described to determine
femoral component rotation, and three ways to determine tibial component
rotation in total knee replacement (TKR). Each method has its advocates
and each has an influence on knee kinematics and the ultimate short
and long term success of TKR. Of the four femoral component methods,
the author prefers rotating the femoral component in flexion to
that amount that establishes a stable symmetrical flexion gap. This
judgement is made after the soft tissues of the knee have been balanced
in extension. Of the three tibial component methods, the author prefers rotating
the tibial component into congruency with the established femoral
component rotation with the knee is in extension. This yields a
rotationally congruent articulation during weight-bearing and should
minimise the torsional forces being transferred through a conforming tibial
insert, which could lead to wear to the underside of the tibial
polyethylene. Rotating platform components will compensate for any
mal-rotation, but can still lead to pain if excessive tibial insert
rotation causes soft-tissue impingement. Cite this article:
Satisfactory primary wound healing following
total joint replacement is essential. Wound healing problems can
have devastating consequences for patients. Assessment of their healing
capacity is useful in predicting complications. Local factors that
influence wound healing include multiple previous incisions, extensive
scarring, lymphoedema, and poor vascular perfusion. Systemic factors
include diabetes mellitus, inflammatory arthropathy, renal or liver
disease, immune compromise, corticosteroid therapy, smoking, and
poor nutrition. Modifications in the surgical technique are necessary
in selected cases to minimise potential wound complications. Prompt
and systematic intervention is necessary to address any wound healing
problems to reduce the risks of infection and other potential complications. Cite this article:
Satisfaction is increasingly employed as an outcome
measure for a successful total knee replacement (TKR). Satisfaction
as an outcome measure encompasses many different intrinsic and extrinsic
factors related to a person’s experience before and after TKR. The
Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry has previously demonstrated on
a large population study that 17% of TKR recipients are not satisfied
with their TKR outcome. This finding has been replicated in other
countries. Similar significant factors emerged from these registry
studies that are related to satisfaction. It would appear that satisfaction
is better after more chronic diseases and whether the TKR results
in pain relief or improved function. Importantly, unmet pre-operative
expectations are a significant predictor for dissatisfaction following
a TKR. It may be possible to improve rates by addressing the issues
surrounding pain, function and expectation before embarking on surgery. Cite this article:
We have investigated the benefits of patient
specific instrument guides, applied to osteotomies around the knee. Single,
dual and triple planar osteotomies were performed on tibias or femurs
in 14 subjects. In all patients, a detailed pre-operative plan was
prepared based upon full leg standing radiographic and CT scan information.
The planned level of the osteotomy and open wedge resection was
relayed to the surgery by virtue of a patient specific guide developed
from the images. The mean deviation between the planned wedge angle
and the executed wedge angle was 0° (-1 to 1, Cite this article:
