The optimal protocol for antibiotic loading in the articulating cement spacers for the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains controversial. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of articulating cement spacers loaded with a new combination of antibiotics. A retrospective cohort study involving 114 PJI cases treated with implantation of an articulating cement spacer between 2005 and 2016 was performed. The treatment outcomes of the conventional protocol (i.e. gentamicin and vancomycin (GV protocol)) were compared with those reported using the sophisticated antibiotic-loading protocol (i.e. vancomycin, meropenem, and amphotericin (VMA protocol)).Objectives
Methods
The optimal protocol for antibiotic loading in the articulating cement spacers for the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains controversial. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of articulating cement spacers loaded with a new combination of antibiotics. A retrospective cohort study involving 114 PJI cases treated with implantation of an articulating cement spacer between 2005 and 2016 was performed. The treatment outcomes of the conventional protocol (i.e. gentamicin and vancomycin (GV protocol)) were compared with those reported using the sophisticated antibiotic-loading protocol (i.e. vancomycin, meropenem, and amphotericin (VMA protocol)).Objectives
Methods
Follow-up radiographs are usually used as the
reference standard for the diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures. However,
these are prone to errors in interpretation. We performed a meta-analysis
of 30 clinical studies on the diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures,
in which agreement data between any of follow-up radiographs, bone scintigraphy,
magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, or CT could be obtained, and combined
this with latent class analysis to infer the accuracy of these tests
on the diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures in the absence
of an established standard. The estimated sensitivity and specificity
were respectively 91.1% and 99.8% for follow-up radiographs, 97.8%
and 93.5% for bone scintigraphy, 97.7% and 99.8% for MRI, and 85.2%
and 99.5% for CT. The results were generally robust in multiple
sensitivity analyses. There was large between-study heterogeneity
for the sensitivity of follow-up radiographs and CT, and imprecision
about their sensitivity estimates. If we acknowledge the lack of a reference standard for diagnosing
suspected scaphoid fractures, MRI is the most accurate test; follow-up
radiographs and CT may be less sensitive, and bone scintigraphy
less specific.
