header advert
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1579 - 1582
1 Dec 2009
Starks I Roberts S White SH

We present a prospective review of the two-year functional outcome of 37 Avon patellofemoral joint replacements carried out in 29 patients with a mean age of 66 years (30 to 82) between October 2002 and March 2007. No patients were lost to follow-up. This is the first independent assessment of this prosthesis using both subjective and objective analysis of outcome. At two years the median Oxford knee score was 39 (interquartile range 32 to 44), the median American Knee Society objective score was 95 (interquartile range 90 to 100), the median American Knee Society functional score was 85 (interquartile range 60 to 100), and the median Melbourne Knee score was 28 (interquartile range 21 to 30). Two patients underwent further surgery. Only one patient reported an unsatisfactory outcome.

We conclude that the promising early results observed by the designing centre are reproducible and provide further support for the role of patellofemoral joint replacement.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 85-B, Issue 2 | Pages 309 - 309
1 Mar 2003
WHITE SH JONES P HARCOURT WGV


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1176 - 1177
1 Nov 2001
White SH

A technique for stabilising the superior tibiofibular joint using an autogenous biceps graft passed through a tibial tunnel is described. The common peroneal nerve should be decompressed and the lateral inferior genicular artery protected. The technique proved to be safe and effective in two patients who were followed for at least two years.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 3 | Pages 345 - 347
1 Apr 2001
Harcourt WGV White SH Jones P

There is a need for the accurate measurement of the outcome after knee surgery. The Oxford Knee Score is being increasingly used since it is reported to be short, simple, inexpensive and validated.

We sent the questionnaire to 346 patients awaiting surgery to the hip or lumbar spine. Only 11% of 141 patients with proximal pathology who denied knee problems gave a maximum score. Their mean score was substantially lower than expected at 28.7 (maximum 48), and was significantly lower than the score of 36.5 obtained from patients after total knee replacement.

We therefore suggest that the frequent coexistence of hip or spinal pathology will significantly alter both the absolute score and any improvement to be expected after knee surgery. Although sensitive to disability originating from the knee the Oxford Knee Score is not sufficiently specific since it is heavily influenced by more proximal pathology.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 83-B, Issue 1 | Pages 113 - 115
1 Jan 2001
Toms AD Williams S White SH

We describe two patients with obturator dislocation of the hip which was irreducible by described techniques of closed reduction. The first required open reduction using the iliofemoral approach with release of rectus femoris. The second was treated on a traction table which allowed disengagement of the head and, when combined with simultaneous lateral traction, adduction and gradual release of the longitudinal traction, facilitated a smooth reduction. Since the hip is stable in flexion, early mobilisation in an extension-limiting brace avoids the prolonged bed rest traditionally recommended for this injury.