A poor response to chemotherapy (≤ 90% necrosis)
for osteosarcomas leads to poorer survival and an increased risk of
local recurrence, particularly if there is a close margin of excision.
We evaluated whether amputation confers any survival benefit over
limb salvage surgery (LSS) with narrow margins in patients who respond
poorly to chemotherapy. We only analysed patients with an osteosarcoma of the limb, a
poor response to chemotherapy and close margins on LSS (marginal/intralesional)
or primary amputation: 360 patients (36 LSS (intralesional margins),
197 LSS (marginal margins) and 127 amputations) were included. Local
recurrence developed in 13 (36%) following LSS with intralesional
margins, and 39 (20%) following LSS with marginal margins. There
was no local recurrence in patients who underwent amputation. The
five-year survival for all patients was 41% (95% confidence interval
(CI) 35 to 46), but for those treated by LSS with marginal margins
was 46.2% (95% CI 38 to 53), 36.3% (95% CI 27 to 45) for those treated
by amputation, and 28% (95 CI 14 to 44) for those treated by LSS
with intralesional margins. Patients who had LSS and then developed
local recurrence as a first event had the same survival as those
who had primary amputation without local recurrence. Prophylactic
adjuvant radiotherapy was used in 40 patients but had no discernible
effect in preventing local recurrence. Although amputation offered better local control, it conferred
no clear survival benefit over LSS with marginal margins in these
patients with a poor overall prognosis. Cite this article:
