The role of arthroscopy in the treatment of soft-tissue
injuries associated with proximal tibial fractures remains debatable.
Our hypothesis was that MRI over-diagnoses clinically relevant associated
soft-tissue injuries. This prospective study involved 50 consecutive
patients who underwent surgical treatment for a split-depression fracture
of the lateral tibial condyle (AO/OTA type B3.1). The mean age of
patients was 50 years (23 to 86) and 27 (54%) were female. All patients
had MRI and arthroscopy. Arthroscopy identified 12 tears of the
lateral meniscus, including eight bucket-handle tears that were
sutured and four that were resected, as well as six tears of the
medial meniscus, of which five were resected. Lateral meniscal injuries
were diagnosed on MRI in four of 12 patients, yielding an overall
sensitivity of 33% (95% confidence interval (CI) 11 to 65). Specificity
was 76% (95% CI 59 to 88), with nine tears diagnosed among 38 menisci
that did not contain a tear. MRI identified medial meniscal injuries
in four of six patients, yielding an overall sensitivity of 67%
(95% CI 24 to 94). Specificity was 66% (95% CI 50 to 79), with 15
tears diagnosed in 44 menisci that did not contain tears. MRI appears to offer only a marginal benefit as the specificity
and sensitivity for diagnosing meniscal injuries are poor in patients
with a fracture. There were fewer arthroscopically-confirmed associated
lesions than reported previously in MRI studies. Cite this article:
In type-II fractures of the odontoid process, the treatment is either conservative in a halo vest or primary surgical stabilisation. Since nonunion, requiring prolonged immobilisation or late surgery, is common in patients treated in a halo vest, the identification of those in whom this treatment is likely to fail is important. We reviewed the data of 69 patients with acute type-II fractures of the odontoid process treated in a halo vest. The mean follow-up was 12 months. Conservative treatment was successful, resulting in bony union in 32 (46%) patients. Anterior dislocation, gender and age were unrelated to nonunion. However, nonunion did correlate with a fracture gap (>
1 mm), posterior displacement (>
5 mm), delayed start of treatment (>
4 days) and posterior redisplacement (>
2 mm). We conclude that patients presenting with these risk factors are unlikely to achieve bony union by treatment in a halo vest. They deserve careful attention during the follow-up period and should also be considered as candidates for primary surgical stabilisation.
We used MRI to study a prospective series of 95 patients with inversion injuries of the ankle and no fracture on plain radiographs. We found an incidence of bone bruises of 27%, but these made no difference to the time of return to work, limitation of walking or physical activity, or the clinical outcome scores at three months. We conclude that bone bruises have very little clinical significance after inversion injuries of the ankle.
