header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 47-B, Issue 1 | Pages 56 - 60
1 Feb 1965
Charnley J Kettlewell J

1. The customary method of broaching and of knocking the prosthesis down into the neck of the femur produces an indeterminate interference fit.

2. The usual interference fit may suffer progressive breakdown under even small, steady loads. This results in a permanent relative movement between prosthesis and femur as the metal insert "beds " into the bone.

3. Modification of the usual practice by providing a clearance fit between prosthesis and femur and cementing of the metal into the bone provides a system which has been shown to be free of breakdown under steady loads up to about 450 pounds.

4. By cementing the prosthesis shaft into the femur permanent relative movement between the elements has been shown to be reduced from approximately four-hundredths of an inch per 100 pounds load to two ten-thousandths of an inch per 100 pounds load–that is, a reduction of 200 to 1.